Pregnant Women in Rural Pennsylvania Face Expanding ‘Maternity Deserts.’ Here’s Why.

Bethany Rodgers, Pocono Record

Some days, Tiffany Rodriguez’s hands swelled up so badly she could barely make a fist, and simple tasks like hooking her bra or putting on her pants seemed to take forever.

Because of the soaring hypertension she experienced during the second half of her pregnancy, the 31-year-old from Montrose, was also coming down with pounding headaches and noticing spots or blurry patches in her field of vision. As her blood pressure continued to tick upward, doctors were growing concerned about the health of her pregnancy. But Rodriguez was determined to do whatever she could to carry her baby, Carter, until his scheduled delivery in mid-August.

She asked for shorter shifts at the local supermarket deli, a job that keeps her on her feet for hours at a time. She also hustled to a battery of prenatal checkups to make sure her hypertension didn’t worsen into preeclampsia, a serious condition that can cause preterm birth and endanger the life of the mother. Every week, she was supposed to go in for her standard doctor’s visit, plus sit through tests to monitor her baby’s heart rate, a process that could take hours at a time. And with a 30- or 45- minute drive between her rural township and these medical services, these visits could consume half of her day.

There was little choice considering the lack of specialized maternity services in her community, a small northeastern Pennsylvania town ringed with bluestone quarries and soaring old-growth hemlock forests. Rodriguez’s hometown — where she recently returned for a fresh start after leaving a marriage she says was unhealthy — also boasts a brewery, an annual blueberry festival and a handful of fast-food options. But there are no obstetricians working at its local hospital. And there are none at Susquehanna County’s only other hospital, which shut down its maternity unit in the 1990s. A wave of other small-town hospitals in Pennsylvania have followed suit, forcing Rodriguez and many other rural women to seek services and give birth in facilities farther and farther from where they live.

In 2020, six Pennsylvania counties, Cameron, Forest, Greene, Juniata, Sullivan and Wyoming, met the criteria for a maternity desert because of the absence of delivery hospitals or obstetricians in those areas, according to the March of Dimes. These deserts are only expected to multiply, experts say. In some cases, women are so far away from the hospital where they’ll give birth that they have to schedule their deliveries, according to one obstetrician. These deserts can also hinder them from accessing the prenatal care that can keep them and their babies healthy during their pregnancies.

For Rodriguez, several overlapping challenges made it tough to get to appointments. She’s a single mother of a 10-year-old daughter, and finding childcare can be difficult. And it wasn’t always easy to clear space in her schedule at the deli, work she’s banked on to secure an apartment for her, her daughter and her new baby. Then, there are the fuel costs to consider. Rodriguez said one week she spent six days in a row driving to medical appointments in Scranton, Wilkes-Barre and Tunkhannock. “It was like $120 almost in gas just for those days to go to the doctor’s,” she said during an early August interview.

Rodriguez, health workers and Pennsylvania policymakers agree these rural communities need more maternal healthcare resources. But experts say there’s no quick fix to the financial pressures and staffing shortages that are driving delivery rooms and clinics to close, especially with aging populations and declining birth rates.

“Some of the smaller facilities are going to feel (the demographic changes) and then really struggle to be able to keep the lights on,” said Dr. Amanda Flicker, an OB/GYN and chair of the Pennsylvania section of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. “We just have to decide … that the health of mothers and the safe birth for newborns is something we need to prioritize.”

Expanding deserts

Money is one major driver in the closure of delivery rooms and even entire hospitals across Pennsylvania, health experts say.

Since 2005, nine rural Pennsylvania hospitals have closed or transitioned to specialty care as it’s become increasingly difficult to keep these types of medical facilities operating in the black. Another 17 have chosen to eliminate their labor and delivery units, according to a Hospital and Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania analysis.

“The fact that we see fewer labor and delivery units in rural communities is not in any way a statement about the dedication of those hospitals to providing comprehensive care,” said Lisa Davis, who directs the Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health. “It just means they may not be able to afford it.”

One issue: Medicaid, which covers about half of all rural births nationwide, fails to provide adequate reimbursement rates for obstetric care, according to a 2022 U.S. Government Accountability Office analysis. Doctors say there are issues with private insurance as well, noting that carriers often offer a bundled payment for obstetrics, regardless of how much care a particular woman ends up needing.

“No matter how many times I see them, whether they get a vaginal delivery or a C-section, I’m getting paid by the insurance company one flat fee for all of their care,” said Dr. Stacy Beck, an OB/GYN at UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital in Pittsburgh and co-chair of the Pennsylvania Maternal Mortality Review Committee.

In addition, obstetricians and gynecologists deal with high liability insurance costs because of the number of malpractice claims they face.

In 2020, insurance premiums for OB/GYNs in Philadelphia totaled almost $120,000 each, about $30,000 more than general surgeons and $95,000 more than internists, according to an American Medical Association analysis of selected insurance companies. The staffing demands of a labor and delivery unit make it even harder to keep them open.

Because babies can arrive at any hour, these units require the round-the-clock presence of nurses and physicians, but it’s becoming increasingly challenging for hospitals to fill these shifts.

The medical field in general is facing labor shortages, and the taxing nature of a job in the maternity ward can make it even harder to retain specialists, according to health experts. As many as three-quarters of OB/GYNs experience professional burnout, an American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists report found.

“It’s really just, where have the doctors gone?” said Flicker, chair of obstetrics and gynecology in the Lehigh Valley Health Network.

Many are taking early retirements, she said, or moving out of direct clinical care. The same thing is happening with nurses in maternity units, Flicker added.

Even outside hospitals, obstetricians are in short supply in many rural parts of Pennsylvania, and of those who are practicing, a higher percentage are over age 75 compared to other areas of the commonwealth, according to a report by the Center for Rural Pennsylvania.

The number of OB/GYNs in Pennsylvania is expected to flatline between 2018 and 2028, with 0% growth forecasted by analysts at Projections Central, a federally-funded program that makes state and local projections. And that prognostication doesn’t take into account the rural-urban divide.

New physicians are sometimes reluctant to leave urban areas where they have more professional support and community amenities, so reversing that trend could be challenging, experts say. The erosion of robust health systems in some rural communities can also discourage health providers from moving into them, creating something of a vicious cycle, said Davis, director of the rural health office.

In the meantime, services continue receding. Wilkes-Barre General Hospital is among the latest medical facilities to stop delivering babies.

Erica Acosta, director of diversity initiatives at Wilkes University, was one of the women who’d been planning to give birth there. But about halfway through her pregnancy, when the hospital announced it would close its maternity ward, she had to make a quick pivot to another medical center and another physician.

Acosta said she’d chosen her original provider carefully; as a woman of color, she’s intentional about seeking physicians who look like her, although that’s not always easy because of the lack of diversity in the medical field, she said. And though her pregnancy has been free of complications so far, she said it was still difficult to lose an OB/GYN who’d been with her since she started contemplating having a second child.

“It’s very traumatic because you build trust. I told them I want to have a baby. They already knew my life story,” she said. “So now I have to start over and be vulnerable with people I don’t know.”

The importance of maternity care

For many young and healthy pregnant women, prenatal visits mostly provide reassurance that their babies are developing normally and everything is on track, Beck said.

But with increasing obesity rates and the number of women who are having babies later in life, she explained, more pregnancies are no longer in the low-risk category, and these medical appointments can play an essential role in addressing pre-existing diseases and other health concerns.

During early visits, physicians check a pregnant patient’s general health and monitor her for signs of preeclampsia. In certain cases, it might have been years since a person has seen a medical professional.

“Sometimes pregnancy is the only time we get the opportunity to take care of decades of diabetes or high blood pressure that somebody has not been controlling,” Beck said.

Prenatal care is also vital in screening for substance-use disorders, medical experts say. Accidental or intentional overdoses are the leading cause of maternal death in Pennsylvania, and Flicker said it’s scary to see hospitals closing and providers leaving in rural communities where at-risk women live.

Researchers have linked fewer pregnancy appointments to preterm birth and low birth weight. Still, in rural Somerset County, roughly one of every 20 babies is born without any prenatal care, according to the Center for Rural Pennsylvania. And the number of women in southcentral Pennsylvania who are forgoing a first-trimester doctor’s visit is on the rise, said Kim Amsley-Camp, a Chambersburg-based midwife with Keystone Health.

Getting to these appointments can be challenging for many women, especially those who live far away from the nearest hospital or clinic. Women who don’t have their own cars or who share one with a partner struggle to travel to their appointments, especially considering the lack of robust public transportation options in many rural areas, experts say.

Others already have kids and don’t have anyone to watch their children while they’re away at a doctor’s office or can’t afford to take time off from their jobs. Particularly in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, some people distrust the medical profession, Amsley-Camp said, and many don’t have adequate insurance coverage.

Davis said some pregnant women access services in their local emergency rooms, which she said is an important option but is also expensive and deprives the patient of the ability to form a long-term relationship with prenatal providers. Distance can also create complications when it’s time to give birth, experts say.

For women who aren’t sure if they’re in labor, heading over to the hospital might not be a big deal if they live a few minutes down the road. The decision looks much different when someone is an hour or more away and doesn’t want to make an unnecessary trip, Amsley- Camp said.

Davis has been hearing about paramedics in rural areas delivering babies in the back of ambulances rushing to the hospital but unable to make it in time. Between 2010 and 2020, the number of live births that happened in Pennsylvania homes and doctor’s offices (or other locations outside of a hospital or birthing center) shot up by roughly 50%, even as the overall number of deliveries declined, according to state health department data, though these figures are not broken down between rural and urban counties. Amsley-Camp knows of one woman who gave birth to twins in her driveway.

As people move to rural areas with the telework boom, healthcare access could be one factor as they choose a small-town home, says Abby Weaver, a mother and business owner in Schuylkill County. As Weaver recently navigated a complicated pregnancy, she says she appreciated the proximity of her town’s hospital, which is part of the Lehigh Valley Health Network. A recent Center for Rural Pennsylvania report found that more people were moving into rural counties than out of them in 2019 and 2020. But Weaver, who has been part of Pottsville’s revitalization efforts for the past six or seven years, said new arrivals often expect big-city amenities and services to follow them. “You have to be able to match things like what you see in bigger cities, like a coffee shop, like good health care, like good school systems, for people to choose you,” she said.

What are the solutions?

There aren’t any simple ways to halt the expansion of Pennsylvania’s maternity deserts, but analysts and experts are full of ideas about where to start.

Increasing Medicaid rates — which are set at a state level — could make a dent in the problem, but Davis said because of policymakers’ reluctance to drive up healthcare costs, the chances of that happening in the near future seem remote. The commonwealth’s leaders could also look at expanding transportation services in rural communities, working with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation to add ride programs, she said. Doing more to recruit health professionals and opening more standalone birthing centers — which now operate only in Pennsylvania’s urban counties — could also make a difference.

Christine Haas, executive director of the Midwife Center in Pittsburgh, said the proliferation of facilities like hers could definitely be part of closing service gaps. But she said various barriers stand in the way: There are steep startup costs for opening a birth center, and these facilities sometimes struggle with state requirements, such as needing to have a physician serve as a medical director. Even the Midwife Center, which Haas said is one of the nation’s largest birth centers, opted against opening a second location because of the challenges involved, she said.

However, change could be on the horizon as congressional lawmakers consider legislation that would aim to improve reimbursement for services offered by freestanding birth centers, Haas said. This bipartisan legislation, called the BABIES Act, has been introduced in both the U.S. House and Senate. The Center for Rural Pennsylvania report also suggests the commonwealth could make more of the midwives, doulas, lactation consultants and other medical professionals to help close some of the provider gaps.

For example, nurse-midwives must now have an established collaborative agreement with a physician in order to practice to the full extent of their training, and many times that means they must affiliate with a large medical system, according to Amsley-Camp. These restrictions can prevent midwives from being able to open their own smaller practices in underserved areas, she said. “To have a practice out of these outlying counties would be fantastic,” she said. “But if the (midwife) is not working for one of these big organizations, the physician is not going to sign on. It’s an unknown entity.”

With the expansion of telehealth, medical providers can also look at handling some prenatal visits virtually rather than making women come into the practice every time. In more remote areas, maybe it makes sense to send pregnant people home with a scale and a blood pressure cuff to use during online appointments so they can avoid a few long drives to the clinic, Flicker said. In order for that to work, though, many rural communities would need better access to broadband.

And with nonprofit groups already targeting rural underserved populations, state lawmakers could consider making more investments in programs that already exist, according to the Center for Rural Pennsylvania report. Federally-qualified health centers, or federally-funded nonprofit clinics that target underserved populations, are one important resource for rural communities, experts say. One of them, Primary Health Network, runs about 50 sites in 16 Pennsylvania counties, providing care regardless of a patient’s insurance status or ability to pay, according to George Garrow, the organization’s chief executive officer. These centers don’t have delivery rooms, but they do provide prenatal and postpartum services and help patients confront any barriers to accessing care, Garrow said.

Rodriguez, the expectant mother in Montrose, said she isn’t sure how she’d have managed if not for Elizabeth Cassidy, a nurse who works for a Pennsylvania nonprofit called Maternal and Family Health Services. While she has to navigate winding rural highways to most of her appointments, Cassidy comes to Rodriguez, spending time chatting on her living room couch or in the local Dunkin’ Donuts. She was the first to help Rodriguez identify her blood pressure as a concern, and the pregnant woman says she’s come to consider the nurse a friend. “I would probably fight somebody if they were mean to her,” joked Rodriguez, who ended up delivering her son Aug. 18.

The nurse-family partnership, a program within Maternal and Family Health Services serving lower-income mothers, assigns nurses like Cassidy to meet with clients throughout their pregnancy and in the first two years of their child’s life. Through the program, Rodriguez has also gotten access to educational resources, baby supplies and sessions with a trained counselor. While Maternal and Family Health Services operates in eastern Pennsylvania, different organizations run nurse-family partnerships in other parts of the commonwealth. However, about 20 counties fall outside the program’s scope, and because it targets first-time mothers and includes income restrictions, not all families are eligible.

Cassidy says the challenges Rodriguez faces in accessing medical care are not uncommon for the women she serves. “Nothing is closer than 40 minutes, 45 minutes for any of these clients,” she said.

The USA Today Network is covering health care access issues in rural parts of the commonwealth. As part of this reporting, we’re interested in hearing from Pennsylvanians in these communities who have struggled to access medical, dental and mental health care. Fill out the form at bit.ly/pa-maternity and your response will go directly to a USA Today Network reporter. You may be contacted for further details about your story.

How to Find Maternity Care in Rural Pennsylvania

Bethany Rodgers, Beaver County Times

Health care representatives and policymakers in Pennsylvania are warning of declining maternity services in rural parts of the commonwealth, a shift that’s making it harder for pregnant women in these communities to access vital care.

But as hospitals continue to close down labor units and obstetricians exit some small towns, an array of organizations are working to help fill the health care gaps left behind.

More: Pregnant women in rural Pa. face expanding ‘maternity deserts.’ Here’s why.

Here are a few of the resources available to rural residents who are or are planning to become pregnant:

Rural Health Clinics

The federal government established a rural health clinic program in the 1970s in response to the lack of physicians in these areas who would treating Medicare patients. By receiving a designation through this program, clinics can benefit from enhanced Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates.

Today, there are about 70 of these health clinics scattered across rural parts of the commonwealth, according to the Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health.

While not all of the health system’s clinics have an OB/GYN, Pierce said the primary care providers at these facilities do offer prenatal services and help connect a patient with more specialized care elsewhere.

“They will get the patient started with the prenatal vitamins, get them tested to make sure they’re pregnant, get them started on the right path,” she said.

A list of Pennsylvania’s rural health clinics is accessible at bit.ly/3t67h8V.

More:  Erie medical research institute has laid foundation for clinical trials in women’s health

Federally Qualified Health Centers

One of the missions of federally qualified health centers is to provide care in underserved communities, including rural areas. They are also obligated to care for any patient, regardless of the person’s insurance status or ability to pay.

Pennsylvania has about 99 FQHC sites in rural areas, according to the Center for Rural Pennsylvania.

George Garrow, CEO of Primary Health Network, an FQHC that has sites in 16 counties, said that while his health system doesn’t operate any hospitals where someone could give birth, the organization does offer a wide range of primary care services.

Many of its locations deliver behavioral or mental health services, and the network also makes use of case navigators to help patients with their individual needs and to avert any obstacles to care, Garrow said.

Navigators, for instance, might make sure a woman gets started on her prenatal vitamins early in her pregnancy or connect her with obstetricians and other specialists.

Community health workers in the network also assist people who have trouble getting to appointments, using partnerships with transportation programs or by contracting with ridesharing services, Garrow said. And the network also operates a charitable foundation that can aid people who can’t afford the cost of their prescription medicines.

You can search for FQHCs by county and specialty at my.pachc.org/Find-a-Health-Center

Jasmin Martinez Castellanos, M.D.:  Pregnancy brings higher risk of cardiovascular disease

Nurse-family partnerships

Through this program, women who are lower income can receive regular home visits from a nurse during their pregnancies and for the first two years of their child’s life.

Elizabeth Cassidy, a nurse who works in the partnership, said she aims to check in on women anywhere from once every several weeks to every week. During these visits, she’ll monitor her clients’ blood pressure, encourage them to establish healthy habits and form a trust-relationship that will continue after their child is born.

“We work with moms to achieve their own goals,” said Cassidy, whose employer, Maternal and Family Health Services, administers the nurse-family partnership program in northeastern Pennsylvania. “It’s not just baby-focused, but also to work on themselves and be the best parent that they can be.”

The nurse-partnership program traditionally is only open to first-time mothers, but Maternal and Family Health Services recently received permission also to serve pregnant women who already have children.

Information on nurse-family partnerships in Pennsylvania is available at nursefamilypartnership.org/locations/pennsylvania/

Paul Speer, M.D.:  High blood pressure during pregnancy can lead to later health issues

The USA TODAY Network is covering healthcare access issues in rural parts of the commonwealth. As part of this reporting, we’re interested in hearing from Pennsylvanians in these communities who have struggled to access medical, dental and mental health care. 

Fill out the form at bit.ly/pa-maternity and your response will go directly to a USA TODAY Network reporter. You may be contacted for further details about your story.

New! CMS Releases Sickle Cell Disease Action Plan

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) continues to recognize the challenges faced by members of the Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) community and is releasing a new Sickle Cell Disease Action Plan to address and eliminate barriers within CMS programs. The actions in this plan are designed to improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities for individuals living with SCD.

The burden of this disease, particularly for people enrolled in CMS programs, underscores the importance for CMS to use existing levers to take action on opportunities and solutions. The Action Plan builds on the Health Equity pillar of the CMS Strategic Plan and the goals under the CMS Framework for Health Equity. It also aligns with the mission and vision of the CMS National Quality Strategy and the CMS Behavioral Health Strategy’s goal to ensure effective pain treatment and management.

For more information about Sickle Cell Disease and related work that is happening across the agency, check out the resources below and review this recent blog from CMS Administrator Chiquita Brooks-LaSure and Acting CMS OMH Director Dr. Aditi Mallick.

Resources

Learn more about other activities surrounding SCD from agencies across the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS):

USDA To Begin Using Most Recent Census Data to Determine Eligibility for Rural Development Programs

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development today announced that USDA, on October 1, 2023, will begin using the most recently released data from the U.S. Census Bureau to determine program eligibility for Rural Development programs.

Beginning in Fiscal Year 2024, the agency will use 2020 Decennial Census population data and 2017-2021 American Community Survey (ACS) income data to determine eligibility. The agency previously used 2010 Decennial Census population data and 2006-2010 ACS data.

Rural Development will also unveil updated online program eligibility maps. The maps will help individuals and organizations applying for Fiscal Year 2024 funding to quickly determine if an area is considered rural and/or eligible for Rural Development programs. The updated maps will be posted to the RD Eligibility Site.

The agency will continue to use 2010 census population data and 2006-2010 ACS income data to process complete applications submitted prior to Sept. 30, 2023, if the:

For more information about the transition to the 2020 Decennial Census data and 2017-2021 ACS data, please contact your RD State Office representative at https://www.rd.usda.gov/about-rd/state-offices.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

HRSA Invests Nearly $90 Million to Address Maternal Health Crisis

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) announced nearly $90 million in awards to support the White House Blueprint for Addressing the Maternal Health Crisis (PDF – 912 KB), a whole-of-government strategy to combat maternal mortality and improve maternal and infant health, particularly in underserved communities.

In recent decades, the United States’ maternal mortality rate has been among the highest of any developed nation. Disparities in mortality are stark — Black women are more than three times as likely as White women to die from pregnancy-related causes. The Biden-Harris Administration is committed to reversing these trends and making the U.S. the best country in the world to have a baby.

“At the Health Resources and Services Administration, we are laser-focused on reversing this crisis by expanding access to maternal care, growing the maternal care workforce, supporting moms experiencing maternal depression, and addressing the important social supports that are vital to safe pregnancies” said HRSA Administrator Carole Johnson. “We know it will take a sustained approach to reduce and eliminate maternal health disparities and we are committed to this work.”

The Administration’s White House Blueprint for Addressing the Maternal Health Crisis identifies five key goals to realize the vision of the U.S. being the best country in the world to have a baby. Today’s HRSA announcement takes action on each of those goals.

Click here to read more.

What Share of Nursing Facilities Might Meet Proposed New Requirements for Nursing Staff Hours?

On September 1, 2023, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a proposed rule that would create new requirements for nurse staffing levels in nursing facilities, settings that provide medical and personal care services for nearly 1.2 million Americans. The adequacy of staffing in nursing homes has been a longstanding issue. A recent report issued by the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) raised concerns about low nursing staff levels in nursing facilities across the country and the impact on the quality of care for nursing home residents. The high mortality rate in nursing facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted and intensified the consequences of inadequate staffing levels.

The new proposed rule includes several provisions to bolster staffing in nursing homes. It proposes a minimum of 0.55 registered nurse (RN) and 2.45 nurse aide hours per resident day; requires facilities to have an RN on staff 24 hours per day, 7 days per week; strengthens staffing assessment and enforcement strategies; creates new reporting requirements regarding Medicaid payments for institutional long-term services and supports (LTSS); and provides $75 million for training for nurse aides. As noted in the proposed rule, CMS aims to balance the goal of establishing stronger staffing requirements against the practicalities of implementation and costs. Comments on the proposed rule are due by November 6, 2023.

This issue brief analyzes the percentage and characteristics of facilities that would meet the rule’s proposed requirements for the minimum number of RN and nurse aide hours to better understand the implications of the rule. The analysis does not evaluate facilities’ ability to comply with other requirements, including the requirement to always have a registered nurse on duty 24/7 or the ability to meet the new reporting and assessment requirements due to data limitations (see methods). The analysis uses Nursing Home Compare data, which include 14,591 nursing facilities (97% of all facilities, serving 1.17 million or 98% of all residents) that reported staffing levels in August 2023.

Click here to read more and to access the brief.

Black Bisexual Women in Rural Areas Are At Highest Risk for Suicidal Behaviors

Penn State College of Medicine-led research study highlights how gender, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity and rurality contribute to suicide ideation, planning and attempts

Non-Hispanic and Hispanic Black bisexual women who live in rural areas have the highest prevalence of experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors, according to a Penn State-led study. The researchers said this “first-of-its-kind study,” published in JAMA Psychiatry, revealed how various demographic factors intersect to affect a person’s risk of having suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

An estimated 12 million adults in the United States think about suicide every year, with nearly two million attempting suicide annually. While previous studies have examined how individual demographic factors, like race and gender, individually associate with suicide risk, no studies have demonstrated how different factors combine to influence overall risk. Lauren Forrest, assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral health at Penn State College of Medicine, analyzed annual National Survey on Drug Use and Health responses from more than 189,000 individuals who provided information on their gender, race, sexual orientation, ethnicity and how rural their environment is, to study how these factors intersect or combine to affect risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The researchers analyzed data from 2015 to 2019.

“We already know that some groups — like LGBTQIA+ individuals or women — are at increased risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors,” Forrest said. “However, every person possesses multiple identities — including gender, race and sexual orientation, to name a few. Some combinations of identities, for example, Black bisexual women, may be associated with unique suicide risk profiles. But we can’t see these unique risk profiles if we only look at one identity at a time, which is what we’ve been doing thus far in research. It’s important to investigate how prevalence of suicidal thoughts and behaviors varies across intersectional identities, so we can identify populations most at risk and develop interventions specifically for those groups and their unique experiences driving their suicidal thoughts and behaviors.”

The researchers found that the intersectional group with the highest prevalence of suicidal ideation was Hispanic bisexual women living in rural areas — 20% of whom had thought about killing themselves in the last year before they took the survey. By contrast, the intersectional group with the lowest prevalence of suicidal ideation was Hispanic heterosexual men living in large metropolitan counties, where only 3% had contemplated suicide in the year before completing their surveys.

Forrest said the research is based on intersectionality theory, first proposed by Black feminist scholars. Intersectionality theory proposes that health inequities for any group — whether based on gender, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity and/or rurality — arise not due to people’s identities, such as gender, themselves but due to interlocking structural systems of power, privilege and oppression.

According to Forrest, a person can face various types of discrimination based on their gender, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation or simply by where they live. Discrimination can be experienced across levels of influence, which are layered, or nested, within one another. An individual person — the smallest level — is nested within an interpersonal network of peers, family, friends and immediate neighbors. That interpersonal network is nested within a community, and a community is nested within society — the structural systems — at large.

Structural discrimination occurs when there are laws that impose on certain individuals’ rights or welfare, and/or when certain prejudicial attitudes or behaviors are socially acceptable across society, Forrest said. For instance, laws opposing or restricting gay rights is an example of structural discrimination based on sexual orientation. This type of discrimination can set the stage for LGBTQIA+ people to experience more discrimination in their communities, since communities are nested within societies. This discrimination can become more intense on an interpersonal level, too, since interpersonal levels are nested within communities, which are nested within structures.

“When people face multiple types of structural discrimination, such as discrimination based on their sexual orientation and their race, which might be even more heightened in rural areas versus urban areas, it makes sense that the effects of discrimination could compound on one another,” Forrest said. “Discrimination, especially when it’s occurring across identities and levels of influence, is painful. Over time, these repeated and compounding painful discrimination experiences could ultimately contribute to some people contemplating or attempting suicide.”

According to Forrest, her research in this area is just getting started. She plans to continue studying how structural level risk factors, such as structural stigma, interact with individual-level risk factors, such as psychiatric disorders, to jointly impact suicide risk among LGBTQIA+ people living in rural areas. She said her ultimate goal is to collect and analyze data that can ultimately influence policy decisions, especially those relating to health equity.

“I’m passionate about this area of research because it’s important for mental health providers to understand that factors across levels of influence impact suicide risk,” Forrest said. “We often consider, assess and intervene upon individual-level risk factors, like psychiatric disorders. But I’d argue that we rarely, if ever, consider how the structural processes that drive health inequities may be impacting the person sitting in front of us in the therapy or assessment room.”

Forrest noted that better understanding how factors across levels of influence combine to impact suicidal thoughts and behaviors could help mental health professionals better determine the groups most at risk, determine the most potent intervention targets across levels of influence and develop and implement effective interventions for the underlying causes of health disparities and inequities (e.g., structural discrimination). She said that virtual interventions may be useful in rural settings where health care access may be limited and discrimination may be more severe, compared to more urban areas.

This research is part of Forrest’s training as a Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute KL2 Scholar. Project collaborators include Forrest’s KL2 mentor and senior author, Emily Ansell, associate professor of biobehavioral health at Penn State College of Health and Human Development and Penn State Social Science Research Institute scholar; Sarah Gehman, College of Medicine medical student; Cara Exten, assistant professor of biobehavioral health at Penn State Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing; and Ariel Beccia of Harvard Medical School. The researchers declare no conflicts of interest.

This research was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute. The views expressed are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institutes of Health.

If you or someone you know is experiencing suicidal thoughts or behaviors, help is always available. Call 988; contact the crisis text line by texting PA to 741741; call the Trevor lifeline, for LGBTQIA+ individuals, at 1-866-488-7386; and/or call the Trans Lifeline, for trans and gender diverse individuals, at 1-877-565-8860.

New Fact Sheet Highlights the Importance of Kinship Care

September is National Kinship Care Month, recognizing the countless relatives and caregivers who provide full-time nurturing and protection for children who cannot safely remain in the care of their biological parents. Placement in the foster care system is a traumatizing event, impacting all facets of a child’s life, such as their connection to extended family, school, friends, communities and cultures. If a child must be removed from their home, the best option is placement with kin. Too often, kin are arbitrarily disqualified from becoming licensed foster parents.

Our newly released fact sheet identifies policy solutions that can prioritize and simplify kinship placements, allowing children and youth to be raised by and connected to their families.

One policy solution identified in the fact sheet is passing HB 1058, which would give kin a voice in court proceedings. The bill, sponsored by Rep. Krajewski, would allow kin to be heard by the dependency judge overseeing a foster child’s case. When a kin caregiver is denied placement they are not allowed to present their case and facts to the judge tasked with making placement decisions. Giving kin a voice in court will let the judge hear directly from them about their qualifications and determine if reconsidering placement, ongoing visitation, or contact is appropriate.

HB 1058 passed the House earlier this year and was approved by the Senate Aging and Youth Committee last week. The bill is now in Senate Appropriations and still requires approval on the Senate floor. PPC will continue to advocate for the passage of the bill as one additional step to ensuring that all children can be placed with and connected to their families.

It’s Not All About Wages: What Workers Want In a Job

Enough money to cover the bills and help them get ahead. Fair treatment. Job security. Time to care for their families and themselves. These are things U.S. workers and job seekers without a four-year degree said they want in a job.

The topic of what makes a quality job emerged organically during listening sessions as part of the Worker Voices Project. Led by the Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta and Philadelphia, Worker Voices looked beyond the numbers to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on how workers without a four-year degree perceive and navigate employment.

Worker Voices Special Brief: Perspectives on Job Quality takes a deep dive into a major theme that emerged during focus groups with 167 U.S. non-college workers and job seekers across the country — what workers want and expect from a job.

Read the report to learn more.