- Weathering the Storm Together: Community Resiliency Hubs Hold the Promise of Local Self-Sufficiency and Supportive Mutual Aid
- Virginia Tech Researchers Bring Rural Families into the Nation's Largest Study of Early Brain and Child Development
- Expanding Access to Cancer Care for Rural Veterans
- VA: Veterans Rural Health Advisory Committee, Notice of Meeting
- Scaling Rural Wellness with Clever Collaboration
- Stroudwater Associates Enhances Rural Healthcare Dashboard with New Data to Support State Rural Transformation Grant Applications
- Harvest Season Is Here: Busy Times Call for Increased Focus on Safety and Health
- HHS Dispatches More Than 70 Public Health Service Officers to Strengthen Care in Tribal Communities
- Wisconsin Rural Hospitals Team up to Form Network
- CMS Launches Landmark $50 Billion Rural Health Transformation Program
- American Heart Association Provides Blood Pressure Kits at Southeast Arkansas Regional Libraries to Support Rural Health
- Broadening Access to Minimally Invasive Surgery Could Narrow Rural-Urban Health Gaps
- Instead of Selling, Some Rural Hospitals Band Together To Survive
- Help Line Gives Pediatricians Crucial Mental Health Information to Help Kids, Families
- Rural Health: A Strategic Opportunity for Governors
Pennsylvania Insurance Exchange Sees Decline in Enrollment

Around 486,000 Pennsylvanians enrolled in Pennie coverage during the 2026 Open Enrollment period compared to 496,000 enrollees for 2025. Enrollment in 2026 went from being 11% higher at the start of Open Enrollment to being 2% lower by the end when compared to 2025.
Roughly 79,500 Pennsylvanians enrolled in coverage through Pennie for the first time, but it was clear that costs remained a barrier with new enrollment being 12% lower than last year. Nearly 18% of enrollees dropped coverage altogether. Terminations were highest among older and rural Pennsylvanians and those with incomes just above Medicaid or above the new income cliff. Fifteen of the top 20 counties, based on proportional disenrollment, were rural counties. Many in these areas relied on the enhanced premium tax credits (EPTCs), which Congress did not extend by the December 31 deadline, to afford higher premiums.
The expiration of EPTCs raised costs, leading to 85,000 people leaving Pennie coverage. Around 33,000 more Pennsylvanians enrolled in bronze plans this year compared to last year, a 30% increase. While the numbers do not seem stark in contrast at this point, typically enrollment drops after the first three months of the year due to consumers not being able to afford the plan they chose.
Medicare Telehealth Waivers Extended Through 2027
The Medicare telehealth waivers that expired on January 30, 2026, have now been formally extended. Congress passed HR 7148, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, and the bill was signed into law, retroactively covering the brief lapse period. This legislation extends key Medicare telehealth flexibilities through December 31, 2027, restoring continuity to coverage and avoiding a return to permanent, pre-pandemic Medicare telehealth policy.
These waivers have been in place since 2020 when the COVID-19 public health emergency began, and have since been extended repeatedly, often on a short-term basis. This longer-term, an almost two-year extension, provides greater stability and reduces near-term uncertainty for providers and patients relying on telehealth services.
The following waivers are now extended:
- Waiver of location requirements (both geographic and type of site).
- Continued eligibility of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Rural Health Clinics (RHCs) as telehealth providers.
- Delay of the prior in-person visit requirement for mental health services when certain permanent telehealth policy requirements are not met.
- Delay of the prior in-person visit requirement for mental health services delivered via telecommunications technology for FQHCs and RHCs.
- Continued allowance of audio-only telehealth services.
417 Rural Hospitals at Risk of Closure
From Becker’s Hospital Review
There are 417 rural hospitals that are vulnerable to closure, according to a Feb. 10 report from Chartis, a healthcare advisory services firm.
Chartis’ Rural Hospital Vulnerability Index assesses more than a dozen indicators to identify which are statistically significant for determining the likelihood of closure.
The number of overall rural hospitals vulnerable is down from 432 last year, but Chartis said there are “notable shifts at the state level.” In Tennessee, the percentage of vulnerable hospitals increased from 44% to 61%. In South Dakota, the percentage increased from 28% to 42%. Mississippi, which Chartis said has long been a “weak spot in the rural health safety net,” saw an improvement from 49% to 42%. Kansas also saw an improvement from 47% to 44%.
Chartis’ analysis found that 17 states have 10 or more rural hospitals vulnerable to closure this year. Texas has the most with 50, followed by Kansas (44), Tennessee (27), Georgia (25), and Mississippi (24). These states are receiving a combined $1.1 billion in the first round of CMS’ Rural Health Transformation Fund initiative.
The percentage of rural hospitals at risk of closure by state is as follows:
More than 41% of hospitals
- Arkansas
- Florida
- Kansas
- Mississippi
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
31% to 40%
- Alabama
- Georgia
- Texas
26%-30%
- South Carolina
21%-25%
- Louisiana
- North Carolina
- Wyoming
16%-20%
- Indiana
- Kentucky
- Missouri
- Nebraska
- New Mexico
- Oklahoma
10%-15%
- Arizona
- Illinois
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Nevada
- New York
- Ohio
- Pennsylvania
- Wisconsin
1%-9%
- California
- Colorado
- Idaho
- Iowa
- Montana
- New Hampshire
- North Dakota
- Oregon
- Utah
- Virginia
- West Virginia
0%
- Alaska
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Hawaii
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- New Jersey
- Rhode Island
- Vermont
- Washington
Since 2010, there have been 206 rural hospitals that have either closed or converted to models that exclude inpatient care, such as the rural emergency hospital designation, according to the report. Texas has experienced the greatest loss of inpatient care, with 27 closures and conversions, followed by Tennessee (18), Oklahoma (13), Kansas (12), and Mississippi (12).
Read the full report here.
‘Key Informants’ Report Farmers Accept Mental Health Help but Face Barriers
Researchers suggest coordinating mental health, financial help programs to improve access, could bolster support for farmers.
Governments and organizations that provide mental health support to farmers dealing with depression, anxiety and isolation have traditionally focused on overcoming the stigma associated with getting help — but that isn’t the barrier farmers face, according to a new study by a research team led by rural sociologists at Penn State. The bigger issues, they found, are rural health care shortages, long wait times for appointments and travel time, as well as high health care costs.
The team said the most recent findings from their ongoing five-year study, published in the Journal of Rural Studies, suggest that more effective programs with added resources to address financial challenges — including efforts to help farmers navigate complex and time-consuming paperwork — could do far more to help farmers.
Farmers experience mental health problems at up to five times the national rate, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation, often related to stress caused by financial pressure and debt, uncertainty about weather and markets, and worries about farm succession and labor shortages. These concerns can be compounded by isolation in rural areas. Despite several organizations and governmental bodies investing in mental health programs for farmers such as counseling, suicide hotlines and educational workshops, many farmers still don’t use available support. According to the researchers, it was believed that this unwillingness resulted primarily from the social stigma associated with mental health challenges.
“This study is the first to look simultaneously at farmers’ willingness to seek help as well as their ability to actually get it,” said study senior author Florence Becot, Nationwide Insurance Early Career Professor and Agricultural Safety and Health Program leader in the College of Agricultural Sciences. “Overall, the investments in programs have been made with limited understanding of farmers’ ability and willingness to engage with mental health support.”
States With the Most Rural Hospitals per 100,000
From Becker’s Hospital Review
Massachusetts has the most hospitals per 100,000 rural residents while Delaware has the fewest, according to a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill report.
The Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at UNC-Chapel Hill used CMS’ rural health transformation program data to determine the number of healthcare facilities and population in rural communities. The report includes population, hospital and non-hospital facilities, and uncompensated care in every state. The data was published in October.
Here is how the states stack up with respect to hospitals per 100,000 rural residents:
- Massachusetts: 13.99
- North Dakota: 12.13
- South Dakota: 10.40
- Kansas: 9.54
- Nebraska: 9.49
- Montana: 9.44
- Florida: 8.80
- Arizona: 7.38
- Iowa: 6.76
- Nevada: 6.62
- Alaska: 6.55
- Wyoming: 6.37
- Minnesota: 6.37
- Louisiana: 6.40
- Connecticut: 6.19
- Oklahoma: 6.02
- Washington: 5.38
- Hawaii: 5.31
- Illinois: 5.95
- Colorado: 5.85
- Utah: 5.80
- Idaho: 5.50
- New York: 5.03
- Michigan: 4.92
- Texas: 4.89
- West Virginia: 4.80
- Wisconsin: 4.76
- Mississippi: 4.68
- Arkansas: 4.64
- New Mexico: 4.44
- California: 4.20
- Alabama: 4.21
- Rhode Island: 4.04
- Ohio: 3.86
- Indiana: 3.88
- Pennsylvania: 3.83
- Maine: 3.90
- Georgia: 3.68
- Missouri: 3.66
- Oregon: 3.65
- Virginia: 3.56
- Kentucky: 3.43
- Tennessee: 3.21
- South Carolina: 3.21
- New Hampshire: 3.20
- Vermont: 2.95
- New Jersey: 2.90
- North Carolina: 2.50
- Maryland: 1.86
- Delaware: 1.64
In 2024, the Sheps Center published a report with the number of total hospitals per state. Read the report here.
New Learning Network Launched on Increasing Access to Primary Care in Rural Communities

The National Academy for State Health Policy (NASHP) is excited to announce a new Increasing Access to Primary Care in Rural Communities Learning Network (Rural Primary Care Learning Network) launching in February 2026. This new learning network will provide a forum for state officials to share promising state approaches for strengthening primary care systems, with a focus on the unique challenges facing rural communities.
Building on many of the strategies outlined in NASHP’s Implementing High-Quality Primary Care: A Policy Menu for States report, the Rural Primary Care Learning Network will facilitate state-to-state learning and conversations around how to strengthen primary care systems and reduce barriers to accessing primary care services, particularly in rural and underserved areas.
Discussions will include how to navigate challenges and opportunities in the current fiscal and policy environment, such as implementation of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), or H.R. 1, as well as how to leverage new resources and momentum for primary care under the CMS Rural Health Transformation program.
Other key strategies and topics will include:
- Expanding, strengthening, and retaining the rural primary care workforce
- Strengthening rural primary care infrastructure, including Community Health Centers, Rural Health Clinics, local networks, and other primary care providers
- Aligning funding and reimbursement strategies to increase access to whole person care
- Investing in technology, data, and other infrastructure to increase access to care
- Reducing administrative and regulatory burdens while preserving program integrity
NASHP’s Rural Primary Care Learning Network is open to all state officials interested in primary care and rural health, including officials from state health and human service agencies, Medicaid programs, state primary care offices, offices of rural health, Medicaid agencies, and state officials engaged in state primary care strategy and policy.
Experts from the National Organization of State Offices of Rural Health (NOSORH) and Milbank Memorial Fund will also provide insights and support for the network.
To learn more or to be added to the network list, please fill out this interest form.
ICYMI: Access the Webinar on Federal Rural Definitions
In case you missed it, the Rural Health Information Hub archived the transcript, audio recording, and slide presentation from the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy’s (FORHP) hour-long webinar on the ways the federal government defines rural areas. Access the webinar at this link: ICYMI: Federal Rural Definitions.
HRSA Seeks Feedback on Maternity Care Health Professional Target Areas

The Health Resources and Services administration’s (HRSA) Bureau of Health Workforce is updating criteria for identifying Maternity Care Target Areas (MCTA) and seeks comments from the public about how the Social Vulnerability Index is used to score this designation for the National Health Service Corps.
Comments are due by March 30.
Input Requested on Hospital Supply Chain Policy

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is requesting public comments on an advance notice of proposed rulemaking focused on strengthening hospital supply chains for personal protective equipment (PPE) and essential medicines. Potential future approaches to support domestic procurement of PPE and essential medicines include a “Secure American Medical Supplies” friendly hospital designation, new payment policies, and a new structural quality measure that would be part of the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program.
Hospital and health system leaders are encouraged to submit comments by March 30 through Regulations.gov.
DEA Finalizes Rule for EMS Under the Protecting Patient Access to Emergency Medications Act
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Rule updating the 2017 Act. The amendment allows for a new registration category for emergency medical services agencies that handle controlled substances and sets new requirements for delivery, storage, and record-keeping related to their handling of controlled substances. See DEA Finalizes Rule for EMS Under the Protecting Patient Access to Emergency Medications Act.