Rural Health Information Hub Latest News

Center for Rural Pennsylvania Hosts Hearing on Advancing Rural Mental Health Awareness and Support

On April 8, 2025, the Center for Rural Pennsylvania Board of Directors held a public hearing at the Capitol Building in Harrisburg to advance awareness and support for rural mental health. The hearing brought together lawmakers, mental healthcare professionals, and community leaders to discuss ongoing challenges and potential solutions related to mental health care in rural Pennsylvania.

“We know rural Pennsylvania faces a unique set of challenges when it comes to mental health care,” said Senator Gene Yaw, Chairman of the Center for Rural Pennsylvania Board of Directors. “Limited access to providers, long distances to travel for treatment, and a shortage of specialized resources all contribute to a system facing significant barriers. The Center for Rural Pennsylvania is working to find innovative solutions to address these challenges. This hearing was an important step towards building a more accessible and supportive mental health system for all Pennsylvanians, no matter where they live.”

“The testimony shared at this hearing highlights the urgent need for ongoing collaboration and solutions to address the mental health challenges facing rural Pennsylvania,” said Representative Eddie Day Pashinski, Vice Chairman of the Center’s Board. “This effort includes expanding access to services, tackling workforce shortages, and reducing stigma.”

“We want Pennsylvania to be a place where mental health services are accessible and effective, no matter where you live,” said Senator Judy Schwank, member of the Center’s Board. “But in our rural communities, people often face a unique set of challenges when it comes to getting the care they need. This hearing is an opportunity to explore some of the most common barriers to mental health care in rural Pennsylvania and begin identifying solutions.”

“I was grateful for the insight provided by mental health professionals, judges, and other officials who testified concerning the unique challenges that exist in rural communities, including homelessness,” said Representative Dan Moul, member of the Center’s Board. “Homelessness is a far more complex problem than I imagined, particularly for those with mental health and substance abuse challenges. Clearly, there is no easy fix, but as we examine this issue, I am hopeful solutions can be found that will build on the resources available.”

“The mental health struggles in our rural communities are not just data points—they’re daily realities for countless Pennsylvanians,” said Dr. Kyle C. Kopko, Executive Director of the Center. “This hearing shed vital light on the challenges and, more importantly, the opportunities to expand care, break down barriers, and ensure no one is left to face these issues alone.”

Testifiers included:

  • The Honorable Judge Tiffany L. Cummings, Magisterial District Court 04-3-03, Tioga County
  • Annette (Annie) L. Strite, M.A., M.H./I.D.D. Administrator and Mental Health Director
  • Andrea B. Kepler, L.C.S.W., Administrator, Dauphin County Mental Health, Autism and Developmental Programs
  • Chris Santarsiero, Vice President of Government Affairs, Connections Health Solutions
  • Kimberly Jones, M.S., L.P.C.S., Vice President of Clinical Operations, Connections Health Solutions
  • Brittney McCarthy, Strategic Account Manager, Connections Health Solutions
  • Dr. Jamie Zelazny, Assistant Professor of Nursing and Psychiatry and Co-Director of the Digital Health Hub, University of Pittsburgh
  • Dr. Brayden N. Kameg, Assistant Professor of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh; Director of the Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Residency Program, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
  • Dr. Brian Schurr, Central Keystone Counseling

To access the hearing recording and testimony, visit the Center’s website at www.rural.pa.gov.

Pennsylvania Childhood Pre-K Fact Sheets & Mapping Available

Each year, PPC creates interactive maps for the Pre-K for PA campaign, and the 2025 maps and corresponding fact sheets are now available. Data on pre-k is available at the statewide, county, school district, and legislative district levels.

The maps highlight the unmet need for high-quality, publicly funded pre-k at each geographic level, including data points such as the eligible child population, high-quality, publicly funded enrollment, and the number of high-quality pre-k locations.

Statewide, of the 151,325 eligible children ages 3-4 living in Pennsylvania, only 44% have access to high-quality pre-kindergarten. With workforce challenges in the sector, an additional 8,477 pre-k staff are needed to serve the remaining eligible children.

As part of an enacted 2025-26 budget, the Pre-K for PA campaign is asking the General Assembly to:

  • Support the proposed investment of $15 million in Pre-K Counts to help stabilize early learning providers by boosting per-child rates to help combat inflationary pressures and staffing shortages caused by low wages.
  • Include an investment of $9.5 million for the Head Start Supplemental Assistance Program to help stabilize the Head Start Workforce.

Access the new fact sheet and online map here.

CMS Finalizes 2026 Payment Policy Updates for Medicare Advantage and Part D Programs

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Calendar Year (CY) 2026 Rate Announcement for the Medicare Advantage (MA) and Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Programs that finalizes the payment policies for these programs. This release — combined with the CY 2026 MA and Part D final rule that was released on April 4 — makes annual routine and technical updates to the MA and Part D programs.

The actions taken by CMS help protect beneficiaries and taxpayers from waste, fraud, and abuse, while also driving access to high-quality, affordable healthcare through Medicare Advantage. By finalizing these payment policies, CMS is ensuring that Medicare Advantage continues to offer access to critical services in an efficient, accountable manner, further strengthening the program’s ability to serve beneficiaries.

Payments from the government to MA plans are expected to increase on average by 5.06% from 2025 to 2026. This is an increase of 2.83 percentage points since the CY 2026 Advance Notice, which is largely attributable to an increase in the effective growth rate. The method for setting the effective growth rate is set in statute and represents the average expected change in the benchmarks, used to determine payment for MA plans, based on the growth in Medicare per capita costs. The effective growth rate is 9.04%, which is higher than the estimate of 5.93% in the CY 2026 Advance Notice. This change is primarily due to the inclusion of additional data on fee-for-service (FFS) expenditures, including payment data through the fourth quarter of 2024, which was not included on account of the early Advance Notice publication.

In CY 2024, CMS initiated a three-year, phased-in approach for removing the medical education costs — related to services MA enrollees receive — from the historical and projected expenditures supporting the FFS costs that are included in the growth rate calculations. For CY 2026, CMS will complete the phase-in of the technical adjustment by applying 100% of the adjustment for MA-related medical education costs.

CMS is also completing a three-year phase-in of improvements to the MA risk adjustment model that the agency finalized in the CY 2024 Rate Announcement, with the first year of the three-year phase-in starting with CY 2024. CMS is committed to expanding access to affordable, high-quality care through Medicare Advantage, while also implementing measures to safeguard beneficiaries and taxpayers from waste, fraud, and abuse. These ongoing improvements support a sustainable program that benefits both current and future Medicare recipients.

CMS is concurrently releasing the Final CY 2026 Part D Redesign Program Instructions that continue to implement the redesign of the Medicare Part D program. These instructions contain a detailed description of, and guidance related to, changes to the Part D drug benefit in place for CY 2026.

The CY 2026 MA and Part D Rate Announcement may be viewed at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/2026-announcement.pdf.

A fact sheet discussing the provisions of the CY 2026 Rate Announcement can be viewed at https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/2026-medicare-advantage-and-part-d-rate-announcement.

The Final CY 2026 Part D Redesign Program Instructions can be found at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/final-cy-2026-part-d-redesign-program-instruction.pdf.

A fact sheet discussing the provisions of the Final CY 2026 Part D Redesign Program Instructions can be viewed at https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/final-cy-2026-part-d-redesign-program-instructions

Blockbuster Deal Will Wipe Out $30 Billion in Medical Debt. Even Backers Say It’s Not Enough.

Underscoring the massive scale of America’s medical debt problem, a New York-based nonprofit has struck a deal to pay off old medical bills for an estimated 20 million people.

Undue Medical Debt, which buys patient debt, is retiring $30 billion worth of unpaid bills in a single transaction with Pendrick Capital Partners, a Virginia-based debt trading company. The average patient debt being retired is $1,100, according to the nonprofit, with some reaching the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The deal will prevent the debt being sold and protect millions of people from being targeted by collectors. But even proponents of retiring patient debt acknowledge that these deals cannot solve a crisis that now touches around 100 million people in the U.S.

“We don’t think that the way we finance health care is sustainable,” Undue Medical Debt chief executive Allison Sesso said in an interview with KFF Health News. “Medical debt has unreasonable expectations,” she said. “The people who owe the debts can’t pay.”

In the past year alone, Americans borrowed an estimated $74 billion to pay for health care, a nationwide West Health-Gallup survey found. And even those who benefit from Undue’s debt relief may have other medical debt that won’t be relieved.

This large purchase also highlights the challenges that debt collectors, hospitals, and other health care providers face as patients rack up big bills that aren’t covered by their health insurance.

Read more.

Dead Zone: Rural Hospitals and Patients Are Disconnected From Modern Care

Leroy Walker arrived at the county hospital short of breath. Walker, 65 and with chronic high blood pressure, was brought in by one of rural Greene County’s two working ambulances.

Nurses checked his heart activity with a portable electrocardiogram machine, took X-rays, and tucked him into Room 122 with an IV pump pushing magnesium into his arm.

“I feel better,” Walker said. Then: Beep. Beep. Beep.

The Greene County Health System, with only three doctors, has no intensive care unit or surgical services. The 20-bed hospital averages a few patients each night, many of them, like Walker, with chronic illnesses.

Greene County residents are some of the sickest in the nation, ranking near the top for rates of stroke, obesity, and high blood pressure, according to data from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Patients entering the hospital waiting area encounter floor tiles that are chipped and stained from years of use. A circular reception desk is abandoned, littered with flyers and advertisements.

But a less visible, more critical inequity is working against high-quality care for Walker and other patients: The hospital’s internet connection is a fraction of what experts say is sufficient. High-speed broadband is the new backbone of America’s health care system, which depends on electronic health records, high-tech wireless equipment, and telehealth access.

Greene is one of more than 200 counties with some of the nation’s worst access to not only reliable internet, but also primary care providers and behavioral health specialists, according to a KFF Health News analysis. Despite repeated federal promises to support telehealth, these places remain disconnected.

During his first term, President Donald Trump signed an executive order promising to improve “the financial economics of rural healthcare” and touted “access to high-quality care” through telehealth. In 2021, President Joe Biden committed billions to broadband expansion.

KFF Health News found that counties without fast, reliable internet and with shortages of health care providers are mostly rural. Nearly 60% of them have no hospital, and hospitals closed in nine of the counties in the past two decades, according to data collected by the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.

Click here for more information and a interactive map that shows where health care shortages and broadband deserts intersect.

Pennsylvania Is 2025’s 4th Best State for Children’s Health Care: WalletHub Study

With workers paying an average of nearly $6,300 per year toward employer-sponsored family coverage and Every Kid Healthy Week kicking off on April 21, the personal-finance website WalletHub today released its report on 2025’s Best & Worst States for Children’s Health Care, as well as expert commentary.

In order to determine which states offer the most cost-effective and highest-quality health care for children, WalletHub compared the 50 states and the District of Columbia across 33 key metrics. The data set ranges from the share of children aged 0 to 17 in excellent or very good health to pediatricians and family doctors per capita.

Children’s Health Care in Pennsylvania (1=Best; 25=Avg.):

  • Overall Rank: 4th
  • 8th – % of Children in Excellent/Very Good Health
  • 27th – % of Uninsured Children
  • 23rd – Infant-Death Rate
  • 11th – % of Children with Unaffordable Medical Bills
  • 3rd – Pediatricians & Family Doctors per Capita
  • 19th – % of Obese Children
  • 11th – % of Children with Excellent/Very Good Teeth

For the full report, please visit: https://wallethub.com/edu/best-states-for-child-health/34455

Key takeaways and WalletHub commentary are included below in text and video format. Feel free to use the provided content as is or edit the raw files as you see fit.

Please let me know if you have any questions or if you would like to arrange a phone, video or in-studio interview with one of WalletHub’s experts.

Rural U.S. Looses 43% of Independent Physicians: 5 Things to Know

From Becker’s Hospital Review

The number of independent physicians in U.S. rural areas declined 43% over five years — from 21,956 in January 2019 to 12,467 in January 2024 — according to an Avalere study sponsored by the Physicians Advocacy Institute.

The analysis — which used the IQVIA OneKey database containing physician and practice location information on hospital and health system ownership — shows a growing shift toward the consolidation of physician services under hospitals and corporate entities in rural areas following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Five things to know:

  1. From 2019 to 2024, rural areas lost nearly 2,500 physicians. This represents a 5% decline from approximately 52,600 to 50,100.
  2. Likewise, the number of medical practices in rural areas fell from 30,000 at the beginning of 2019 to 26,700 in January 2024, an 11% decline.
  3. This declining number of rural medical practices was particularly acute among independent practices, with the number of those practices falling by 7,300 during the study period, marking a 42% decline.
  4. Nearly 9,500 physicians in rural areas left independent practice during the study period. Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, South Carolina and South Dakota saw declines of more than 50% within their independent physician workforce.
  5. During the same period, physician employment in rural areas within hospitals and health systems and corporate entities grew by 15% and 57%, respectively.

Click here to view the full analysis.

Rural Hospitals Question Whether They Can Afford Medicare Advantage Contracts

Rural hospital leaders are questioning whether they can continue to afford to do business with Medicare Advantage companies, and some say the only way to maintain services and protect patients is to end their contracts with the private insurers

Medicare Advantage plans pay hospitals lower rates than traditional Medicare, said Jason Merkley, CEO of Brookings Health System in South Dakota. Merkley worried the losses would spark staff layoffs and cuts to patient services. So last year, Brookings Health dropped all four contracts it had with major Medicare Advantage companies.

“I’ve had lots of discussions with CEOs and executive teams across the country in regard to that,” said Merkley, whose health system operates a hospital and clinics in the small city of Brookings and surrounding rural areas.

Merkley and other rural hospital operators in recent years have enumerated a long list of concerns about the publicly funded, privately run health plans. In addition to the reimbursement issue, their complaints include payment delays and a resistance to authorizing patient care.

But rural hospitals abandoning their Medicare Advantage contracts can leave local patients without nearby in-network providers or force them to scramble to switch coverage.

Medicare is the main federal health insurance program for people 65 or older. Participants can enroll in traditional, government-run Medicare or in a Medicare Advantage plan run by a private insurance company.

In 2024, 56% of urban Medicare recipients were enrolled in a private plan, according to a report by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, a federal agency that advises Congress. While just 47% of rural recipients enrolled in a private plan, Medicare Advantage has expanded more quickly in rural areas.

In recent years, average Medicare Advantage reimbursements to rural hospitals were about 90% of what traditional Medicare paid, according to a new report from the American Hospital Association. And traditional Medicare already pays hospitals much less than private plans, according to a recent study by Rand Corp., a research nonprofit.

Read more.

Apply Now for the 2026 Rural Health Innovation Program

The University of California Berkeley’s Rural Health Innovation (RHI) Program is accepting is now accepting applications for its next cohort of Rural Health Innovation Scholars. This program provides full-tuition scholarships for public health professionals living and working in rural communities to earn their Master of Public Health degree online. Scholars also receive a paid membership in the National Rural Health Association (NRHA).

Since its launch, the program has funded 81 professionals across 32 states, and we are excited to support another 25 scholars beginning in Spring 2026.

Scholars come from a variety of backgrounds, including healthcare, policy, and community leadership, and continue working in their rural communities while completing their degree. Participants will study alongside a diverse cohort of public health students while also engaging in a smaller group with a specialized rural health curriculum. This structure allows scholars to gain broad public health training while focusing on the unique challenges and opportunities in rural health.

The deadline to apply for the next cohort is August 3, 2025. For more information, visit UC Berkeley’s Rural Health Innovation Program.

Study Links Lack of Oral Health Care with Pregnancy Complications

A new study links a lack of oral health care with complications during pregnancy. The study, “Use of Oral Health Services Among Pregnant Women and Associations with Gestational Diabetes and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy,” was recently featured in the Journal of the American Dental Association. The study found that fewer than 40% of women seek preventive oral health care during pregnancy. Women who did not receive preventive oral health care or visit a dentist or dental clinic for oral health problems during pregnancy had an increased risk of gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders.

Click here to read the study.