Rural Health Information Hub Latest News

Idaho’s OB-GYN Exodus Throws Women in Rural Towns Into a Care Void

The ultrasound in February that found a mass growing in her uterus and abnormally thick uterine lining brought Jonell Anderson more than anxiety over diagnosis and treatment.

For Anderson and other patients in the rural community of Sandpoint, Idaho who need gynecological care, stress over discovering an illness is compounded by the challenges they face getting to a doctor.

After that initial ultrasound, Anderson’s primary care provider referred her to an OB-GYN nearly an hour’s drive away in Coeur d’Alene for more testing.

Getting care for more serious gynecological issues, like a hysteroscopy, endometriosis, or polycystic ovary syndrome, has become much more difficult in Sandpoint, a town of about 10,000 people in Idaho’s panhandle region. A state law criminalizing abortions drove multiple OB-GYNs to leave town about a year ago.

The effects have been far-reaching. The OB-GYNs who left Sandpoint were also providing care to patients in nearby outlying areas, like Bonners Ferry, a roughly 40-minute drive into Idaho’s northernmost county. Doctors have spoken out about not feeling safe practicing medicine where they could face criminal charges for providing care to their patients. Republican lawmakers in Idaho contend doctors are being used in an effort to roll back the ban, and they declined to amend the law this year.

According to the Idaho Coalition for Safe Healthcare, a group advocating for a rollback of the state’s strict abortion ban, at least two hospitals, including Bonner General Health in Sandpoint, ended labor and delivery services in the 15 months after the state criminalized abortion in 2022. During that same time period, the number of OB-GYNs practicing in Idaho dropped by 22%. The report’s authors noted that many rural residents rely on consultations from medical specialists in urban parts of the state that are already struggling to provide care.

Read more.

New Read: States With the Most Rural Hospital Closures in the Past 20 Years

From Becker’s Financial Management

Since January 2005, 192 rural hospitals have closed or converted, according to data compiled by the University of North Carolina’s Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research.

Of those hospitals, 105 have completely closed, and 87 have converted, meaning the facilities no longer provide inpatient services, but continue to provide some services, such as primary care, skilled nursing care or long-term care. Since 2020, 36 hospitals have closed or converted. Find the list here.

Here are the states along with their number of rural hospital closures or conversions since 2005:

Alabama

  • Closure: 5
  • Conversion: 2

Alaska

  • Closure: 1

Arkansas

  • Closure: 2

Arizona

  • Closure: 2
  • Conversion: 2

California

  • Closure: 3
  • Conversion: 6

Florida

  • Closure: 4
  • Conversion: 4

Georgia

  • Closure: 2
  • Conversion: 7

Illinois

  • Closure: 1
  • Conversion: 3

Indiana

  • Closure: 2
  • Conversion: 2

Iowa

  • Closure: 1

Kansas

  • Closure: 5
  • Conversion: 5

Kentucky

  • Closure: 4

Louisiana

  • Closure: 2

Maine

  • Closure: 2
  • Conversion: 1

Maryland

  • Closure: 1

Michigan

  • Closure: 2
  • Conversion: 2

Minnesota

  • Closure: 3
  • Conversion: 3

Mississippi

  • Closure: 3
  • Conversion: 3

Missouri

  • Closure: 9
  • Conversion: 1

Nebraska

  • Closure: 2

Nevada

  • Closure: 1
  • Conversion: 1

New Jersey

  • Closure: 1

New Mexico

  • Closure: 1

New York

  • Closure: 3
  • Conversion: 2

North Carolina

  • Closure: 6
  • Conversion: 6

North Dakota

  • Conversion: 1

Ohio

  • Closure: 1
  • Conversion: 2

Oklahoma

  • Closure: 5
  • Conversion: 3

Pennsylvania

  • Closure: 3
  • Conversion: 3

South Carolina

  • Conversion: 4

South Dakota

  • Closure: 2
  • Conversion: 1

Tennessee

  • Closure: 7
  • Conversion: 8

Texas

  • Closure: 14
  • Conversion: 11

Virginia

  • Closure: 1
  • Conversion: 1

Washington

  • Conversion: 1

West Virginia

  • Closure: 3
  • Conversion: 2

Wisconsin

  • Closure: 1

 

HRSA Announces New Policy Action to Improve Access to Housing for People With HIV

New Guidance Will—For the First Time—Enable Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Recipients to Use Funds for Housing Security Deposits for Eligible Patients

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), through the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), announced new policy action to facilitate access to housing for people with HIV served by the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program recipients. The new guidance enables—for the first time—the use of Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program funds to cover housing security deposits for eligible clients. This guidance advances critical elements of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy (PDF – 1 MB) announced by President Biden and the Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S. Initiative and addresses a key barrier that has been raised by patients and advocates.

HRSA Deputy Administrator Jordan Grossman announced this guidance during the Advancing Housing, Health, and Social Care Partnerships Conference, which is bringing together federal agencies, states, and housing and services organizations across the country participating in the HRSA-supported Health and Housing Initiative, the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness ALL INside Initiative, and the HHS and HUD-supported Housing and Services Partnership Accelerator.

“We know that lack of access to stable housing impacts health outcomes for individuals living with HIV,” said Carole Johnson, HRSA Administrator. “This new action will help individuals with HIV by addressing one of the barriers to remaining engaged in care. We look forward to this action helping to facilitate more housing opportunities which will support better health outcomes.”

The Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program provides care and treatment services to more than 560,000 low-income people with HIV, with a strong focus on tailoring approaches to best meet the needs of high-need communities and addressing factors like access to housing and transportation that directly affect clients’ ability to enter and stay in care. In 2022, 77.9% of Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program clients with unstable housing who received medical care reached viral suppression—meaning they cannot sexually transmit HIV to other people and can live a long, healthy life—compared to 90.6% of those with stable housing.

Current program guidelines have been viewed as an obstacle to assisting clients with security deposits. The guidance issued today explains how recipient can use Ryan White Program funds for security deposits for their clients provided that they ensure the deposits are returned to the program, not the client, at the end of the lease.

The National HIV/AIDS Strategy, developed by the White House Office of National AIDS Policy (ONAP) in collaboration with federal partners and with input from the HIV community across the country, outlines a vision for ending the HIV epidemic in the United States through goals, objectives, and strategies to prevent new infections, treat people with HIV to improve health outcomes, reduce HIV-related disparities, and better integrate and coordinate the efforts of all partners.

The Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S. initiative builds upon the foundational efforts of the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program to reach people newly diagnosed with HIV and those who are disconnected from care by enhancing linkage to and engagement in care, decreasing disparities, and improving viral suppression.

HRSA thanks the HIV community for its invaluable contributions in advancing health outcomes for individuals at risk of or experiencing housing instability and homelessness and for sharing insights which have been instrumental in shaping this new guidance.

To access the Security Deposit guidance, please see the Housing Security Deposits in the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program letter (PDF – 81 KB).

See News & Announcements on HRSA.gov.

Philly Fed Assesses Small Business Conditions in Region

For the third year in a row, more than half of small businesses in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware said their financial conditions were poor or fair. Their top operational challenges? Hiring or keeping qualified staff. Reaching customers or growing sales. Supply chain issues.

Distilling data from the Fed’s national 2024 Report on Employer Firms: Findings from the 2023 Small Business Credit Survey, these briefs offer a view into business conditions in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, the Philadelphia metro, and the Third District states overall (Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania).

Additional findings from the survey for Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania:

  • More firms said they experienced no change in their revenues between 2022 and 2023 than did between 2021 and 2022.
  • Fewer firms carried debt, although about the same number of firms applied for loans, lines of credit, or merchant cash advances compared with the previous year.

Read the briefs.

Dental Publication Focuses on Integration of Behavioral Health and Oral Health

The Journal of the California Dental Association published a special issue focused on the integration of behavioral health and oral health. The issue discuses the bi-directional relationship, a framework for integrating behavioral health and oral health in predoctoral education, and resource to support the integration of behavioral health into dental settings.

Click here to read the issue.

New Resource: Using Public Health Hygienists in Health Centers

The Pennsylvania Association of Community Health Centers (PACHC) and the Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health (PORH) created a resource for health centers interesting in adding a public health dental hygiene practitioner (PHDHP) to their team. The resource includes guidance on what PHDHPs are and are not permitted to do and information on employing a PHDHP in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).

Click Here to View the Resource

Closing of Rural Hospitals Leaves Towns With Unhealthy Real Estate

In March 2021, Jellico, TN, a town of about 2,000 residents in the hills of east Tennessee, lost its hospital, a 54-bed acute care facility. Campbell County, where Jellico is located, ranks 90th of Tennessee’s 95 counties in health outcomes and has a poverty rate almost double the national average, so losing its health care cornerstone sent ripple effects through the region.

“Oh, my word,” said Tawnya Brock, a health care quality manager and a Jellico resident. “That hospital was not only the health care lifeline to this community. Economically and socially, it was the center of the community.”

Since 2010, 149 rural hospitals in the United States have either closed or stopped providing in-patient care, according to the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina. Tennessee has recorded the second-most closures of any state, with 15, and the most closures per capita. Texas has the highest number of rural hospital closures, with 25.

Each time a hospital closes there are health care and economic ripples across a community. When Jellico Medical Center closed, some 300 jobs went with it. Restaurants and other small businesses in Jellico also have gone under, said Brock, who is a member of the Rural Health Association of Tennessee’s legislative committee. And the town must contend with the empty husk of a hospital.

Dozens of small communities are grappling with what to do with hospitals that have closed. Sheps Center researchers have found that while a closure negatively affects the local economy, those effects can be softened if the building is converted to another type of health care facility.

Read more.

PRISM Study Summary: Preparing Behavioral Health Clinicians for Success and Retention in Rural Safety Net Practices

This study assesses how, among behavioral health clinicians working in rural safety net practices, the amount of exposure to care in rural underserved communities received during training relates to confidence in skills important in their work settings, successes in jobs and communities, and anticipated retention.

This study summary provides a quick overview of the study published by the Journal of Rural Health.

View the Study Summary here.