- CMS: Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2026 Rates; Requirements for Quality Programs; and Other Policy Changes; Correction
- CMS: Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2026 Rates; Requirements for Quality Programs; and Other Policy Changes; Correction
- CMS: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Contract Year 2026 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage Program, Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Program, Medicare Cost Plan Program, and Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly; Correction
- CMS: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Contract Year 2026 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage Program, Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Program, Medicare Cost Plan Program, and Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly; Correction
- CMS: Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities; Updates to the Quality Reporting Program for Federal Fiscal Year 2026
- CMS: Medicare Program; FY 2026 Hospice Wage Index and Payment Rate Update and Hospice Quality Reporting Program Requirements
- Public Inspection: CMS: Medicare Program: Fiscal Year 2026 Hospice Wage Index and Payment Rate Update and Hospice Quality Reporting Program Requirements
- Public Inspection: CMS: Medicare Program: Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities; Updates to the Quality Reporting Program for Federal Fiscal Year 2026
- CMS: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; CY 2025 Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment and Coverage Policies; Medicare Shared Savings Program Requirements; Medicare Prescription Drug Inflation Rebate Program; and Medicare Overpayments; and Appeal Rights for Certain Changes in Patient Status; Corrections and Correcting Amendment
- CMS: Request for Information; Health Technology Ecosystem
- CMS: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; CY 2025 Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment and Coverage Policies; Medicare Shared Savings Program Requirements; Medicare Prescription Drug Inflation Rebate Program; and Medicare Overpayments; and Appeal Rights for Certain Changes in Patient Status; Corrections and Correcting Amendment
- VA: Staff Sergeant Fox Suicide Prevention Grant Program Funding Opportunity
- State: 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: J-1 Visa Waiver Recommendation Application
- HHS: Request for Information (RFI): Ensuring Lawful Regulation and Unleashing Innovation To Make American Healthy Again
- Public Inspection: CMS: Request for Information: Health Technology Ecosystem
New Study Released: Oral Health and Patients with Intellectual Disabilities
In a cross-sectional study published in Clinical Oral Investigations, investigators used data from the 2023 Special Olympics World Games to analyze the relationship between dental visits and oral health habits among more than 2,100 athletes with intellectual disabilities who took part in voluntary dental screenings. The findings highlighted the critical need for initiatives to minimize barriers to oral health care in this patient population.
Emergency Medicine Experts Separate ‘Myth’ from Reality in ED Boarding
From Becker’s Hospital Review
There’s a longstanding notion in healthcare that patients with low-acuity conditions are a key driver of overcrowding and boarding in emergency departments (ED) — one that emergency medicine experts describe as a misconception that distracts from real solutions.
“I’m not really sure how that myth has been given any legs,” Michael Bublewicz, MD, vice president and chief medical officer of emergency medicine at Houston-based Memorial Hermann Health System, said on a recent episode of the Becker’s Healthcare Podcast.
For years, efforts to ease strain on emergency departments have centered on the idea that healthcare providers should do more to educate patients on when it is appropriate to visit the ED versus an urgent care clinic, or that more urgent care centers should be built near high-volume EDs.
While well intentioned, emergency medicine experts say these efforts are ineffective because they are solely focused on ED input factors, rather than systematic issues across the broader healthcare delivery ecosystem.
“Programs to keep low-acuity patients out of the ED do not reduce boarding because low-acuity patients are rarely admitted to the hospital,” said the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) in a recently published report summarizing key outcomes from its October 2024 summit on ED boarding. The event brought together hospital and health system executives, patients, clinicians and policymakers who emphasized that input-focused interventions alone are ineffective at addressing the systemic throughput failures and misaligned incentives that drive boarding.
The perception that low-acuity patients tie up resources in EDs also ignores the reality that today’s health systems are increasingly caring for patients with complex medical needs. In the U.S., utilization rates of emergency services are highest among homeless individuals, nursing home residents and infants under the age of 1, according to an analysis of national data from the Emergency Department Benchmarking Association (EDBA). Demand for emergency services is only expected to grow as the nation’s population ages.
Estimates vary on the exact share of ED visits that are low acuity, but analyses from EDBA — which pulls data from more than 1,000 emergency departments across the country — indicate these cases account for a relatively small share of overall visits. National data consistently indicate that the share of high-acuity and medically complex ED visits has been rising over time, reflecting broader demographic and clinical trends.
“The low acuity folks that present to EDs are pretty few and far between and they tend to present in hours where access isn’t available,” such as weekends, late-nights and holidays, Dr. Bublewicz said.
James Augustine, MD, vice president of the EDBA, said that EDs today are caring for a much different patient population than in decades past.
“Our ED patients are increasingly senior and they’re increasingly medical – meaning that injured patients occupy less and less of the ED volume,” he told Becker’s. “In my career, we used to see a lot of industrial injuries, sprained ankles and lacerations. The injury population is very much shrinking.”
At AHRQ’s summit, stakeholders unpacked several systemic factors that drive ED boarding, including reduced inpatient bed capacity, financial incentives that prioritize high-revenue surgical cases, administrative issues, and burdensome payer requirements that lead to delays in discharging patients.
Emergency medicine leaders say addressing these root causes requires coordinated efforts that go beyond ED-specific fixes. Hospital-led strategies proven to be effective include smoothing elective surgery schedules across the full week to even out inpatient demand, establishing discharge lounges and protocols to streamline patient flow, and using inpatient bed managers to expedite bed assignments.
Beyond hospital-level efforts, leaders emphasized the need for broader policy changes, including revised payment incentives, public reporting of boarding metrics, development of real-time regional bed tracking systems and expanded access to timely behavioral health services.
Applications Open Now: Appalachian Leadership Institute
Appalachians are leading the way to economic development in their communities!
We’re accepting applications now for our Appalachian Leadership Institute (ALI), which trains people who live or work in the region to:
🌳 Recognize and utilize unique assets in their communities
💡 Identify and implement strategies to improve infrastructure, workforce development, tourism and more
🤝 Collaborate with other leaders to plan for Appalachia’s growth
ALI — at no cost to participants — focuses on skill-building, mentoring and cooperation. Six multi-day seminars will take place across the region from October to June 2026.
Applications are open until June 15, 2025! Learn more and apply now.
Critical Condition: How Medicaid Cuts Would Reshape Rural Health Care Landscapes
Authors: Michelle Mills, Chief Executive Officer, Colorado Rural Health Center; Kevin J. Bennett, Professor, University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Columbia
A defining theme in early 2025 has been reducing federal government expenditures, with the health care sector not being spared from the discussions. The withdrawal or reduction of federal support for Medicaid will have potentially devastating impacts on access to essential healthcare services, particularly for vulnerable rural populations such as the elderly, low-income families, and those with chronic conditions. Thus, the National Rural Health Association (NRHA), along with multiple partners both at the federal and state levels have been advocating for maintaining the federal support for Medicaid.
In rural communities, more people receive and rely on Medicaid coverage than their urban counterparts, due to lower incomes, greater percentage of older adults, higher cost of private insurance, and fewer private coverage options. Nearly 40% of children living in rural communities are covered by Medicaid and CHIP, while almost 20% of non- elderly adults are covered.i Cuts to these populations covered under Medicaid and CHIP would be devastating for rural families. Costs of care for our most vulnerable rural residents would rise to unsustainable levels.
If Medicaid funding is reduced, then it will result in higher rates of uninsurance across the US, with a higher impact in our most vulnerable rural areas. These are parents, children, and working adults who would no longer be able to obtain needed health care due to it being unaffordable. These are our neighbors, many of whom have chronic diseases that have to be regularly managed. Without coverage, many would go without care and end up in the emergency room or inpatient facility, resulting in uncompensated care that they will not be able to pay.
Ultimately, reductions in Medicaid funding will force rural facilities to shut their doors and rural residents to lose access to necessary care. NRHA calls on Congress to act as a unified, bipartisan voice to protect Medicaid funding that is vital to the health and economic sustainability of rural communities across the nation.
Pennsylvania Broadband Funding Resources Available
The PBDA held two webinars providing an overview of the Digital Connectivity Technology (DCTP) Program. These webinars also included presentations from Round One successful applicants, who offered insight to their projects and answered questions from webinar attendees. You can now view the recording of one of those webinars and the presentation utilized during the webinar, on the PBDA’s program page.
As a reminder, the applications for the DCTP will close at 11:59 PM, on Friday May 30, 2025. Additional resources to include updated FAQs can be found on the program page.
Any questions regarding the program, please do not hesitate to contact the PBDA.
Resources Available for Caregivers of Children with Autism
The ASERT Collaborative (Autism Services, Education, Resources and Training) is a statewide partnership that provides streamlined access to information for Pennsylvanians living with and impacted by autism. In partnership with UPMC for You Dental Care Managers, ASERT developed a resource for parents and caregivers to help children with autism prepare for dental visits. The content covers learning to tolerate tooth brushing, establishing dental hygiene routines, and getting ready for dental visits. There are also social stories for getting teeth cleaned, getting x-rays, and getting a cavity filled. Printed resources are also available upon request.
Critical Gaps: U.S. Veterans and Comprehensive Dental Care
The Coalition for Oral Health Policy, an initiative of the Santa Fe Group, published “All Veterans Deserve Comprehensive Dental Care.” This article addresses the critical gap in dental care access for U.S. veterans, highlighting how limited eligibility for dental services contributes to health challenges and financial strain. The authors propose actionable policy solutions to expand access tackling issues such as workforce shortages and outdated eligibility criteria to ensure all veterans receive the comprehensive care they deserve.
PA Coalition for Oral Health Executive Director Receives National Distinguished Service Award
Helen Hawkey, Executive Director of the PA Coalition for Oral Health (PCOH), received the 2025 M. Dean Perkins Distinguished Service Award presented by the Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors (ASTDD) at the 2025 National Oral Health Conference.
Helen was presented the award by PCOH board member, Kelly Braun from the Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health. The Distinguished Service Award is for a member, associate member, non-member, or organization who has made a significant contribution to ASTDD programs, initiatives, or dental public health.
PCOH serves as the dynamic leading voice to improve oral health across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. PCOH promotes oral workforce development, advocates for community water fluoridation, and advances and advocates for oral health policy and infrastructure across all systems. By bringing together a diverse group of leaders from across the state from schools of public health, philanthropic organizations, businesses, dental organizations, health insurance firms, advocacy organizations, state agencies, and other champions, PCOH has built a powerful coalition of more than 1,000 individual and organizational stakeholders.
An excerpt from her nomination notes, “Helen Hawkey has consistently demonstrated an unwavering commitment to advancing dental public health, leaving an indelible mark on the state and national level. Through tireless leadership, effective advocacy, and fostering unity between stakeholders and decision-makers, Helen has played a pivotal role in promoting the necessity of dental public health and ensuring its sustainability. Notably, she has made significant contributions in the areas of assessing the status of oral health in Pennsylvania, championing policy development that promotes access to dental care, and ensuring there is a solid infrastructure to carry out future work.”
Click here to view the full list of all award recipients and nominations presented by ASTDD.
COVID Worsened Shortages of Doctors and Nurses. Five Years On, Rural Hospitals Still Struggle
Even by rural hospital standards, Keokuk County Hospital and Clinics in southeastern Iowa is small.
The 14-bed hospital, in Sigourney, doesn’t do surgeries or deliver babies. The small 24-hour emergency room is overseen by two full-time doctors.
CEO Matt Ives wants to hire a third doctor, but he said finding physicians for a rural area has been challenging since the covid-19 pandemic. He said several physicians at his hospital have retired since the start of the pandemic, and others have decided to stop practicing certain types of care, particularly emergency care.
Another rural hospital is down the road, about a 40-minute drive east. Washington County Hospital and Clinics has 22 beds and is experiencing similar staffing struggles. “Over the course of the last few years, we’ve had not only the pandemic, but we’ve had kind of an aging physician workforce that has been retiring,” said Todd Patterson, CEO.
The pandemic was difficult for health workers. Many endured long hours, and the stresses on the nation’s health care system prompted more workers than usual to quit or retire.
Report: 100 Rural Hospitals Have Closed Labor and Delivery in 5 Years
From Becker’s Hospital Review
Labor and delivery services have ended or are set to end at 100 rural hospitals since the end of 2020, highlighting a growing maternal health access crisis across the U.S.
The findings come from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform’s most recent report on rural maternity care. Since the beginning of 2025, Becker’s has also reported on 13 maternity service closures, with four alone closing in Maine.
The report also revealed that 42% of U.S. rural hospitals still provide labor and delivery services, with less than one-third offering the services in 10 states. Over 130 rural hospitals that still deliver babies lost money in the last two years and could be forced to close the services to maintain financial sustainability.
Travel time to access labor and delivery services in rural areas has also increased. In many urban areas, the services are often accessible in less than 20 minutes, but in rural areas, travel times can take as much as 30 to 50 minutes.
“Rural maternity care is in a state of crisis, and more women and babies in rural communities will die unnecessarily until the crisis is resolved,” the report said. “Federal and state government officials and private employers must take immediate action to ensure that all health insurance plans are paying adequately to support high-quality maternity care in every community.”
Below are 10 states from the report that have seen heightened levels of labor and delivery unit closures since 2020. Their drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services along with the number of rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025 are also listed, per the report.
CHQPR’s full report can be accessed here.
1. Alabama
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 36
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 45 minutes
2. Connecticut
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: One
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: One
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 31 minutes
3. Florida
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Two
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 20
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 50 minutes
4. Idaho
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 14
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 39 minutes
5. Illinois
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Four
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery in 2025: 58
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 32 minutes
6. Indiana
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: 11
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 29
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 30 minutes
7. Maine
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Six
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 13
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 41 minutes
8. Ohio
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Eight
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 38
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 30 minutes
9. Pennsylvania
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Four
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 31
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 39 minutes
10. Wyoming
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 11
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 60 minutes