- CMS: Medicare Program; Implementation of Prior Authorization for Select Services for the Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction (WISeR) Model
- Public Inspection: CMS: Medicare Program: Implementation of Prior Authorization for Select Services for the Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction Model
- CMS: Secretarial Comments on the CBE's (Battelle Memorial Institute) 2024 Activities: Report to Congress and the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
- HHS: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Marketplace Integrity and Affordability
- HRSA Announces Action to Lower Out-of-Pocket Costs for Life-Saving Medications at Health Centers Nationwide
- Public Inspection: HHS: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Marketplace Integrity and Affordability
- Increased Risk of Cyber Threats Against Healthcare and Public Health Sector
- Eight Hospitals Selected for First Cohort of Rural Hospital Stabilization Program
- Announcing the 2030 Census Disclosure Avoidance Research Program
- CMS: Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2026 Rates; Requirements for Quality Programs; and Other Policy Changes; Correction
- CMS: Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2026 Rates; Requirements for Quality Programs; and Other Policy Changes; Correction
- CMS: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Contract Year 2026 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage Program, Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Program, Medicare Cost Plan Program, and Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly; Correction
- CMS: Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Contract Year 2026 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage Program, Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Program, Medicare Cost Plan Program, and Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly; Correction
- CMS: Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities; Updates to the Quality Reporting Program for Federal Fiscal Year 2026
- CMS: Medicare Program; FY 2026 Hospice Wage Index and Payment Rate Update and Hospice Quality Reporting Program Requirements
Applications Open Now: Appalachian Leadership Institute
Appalachians are leading the way to economic development in their communities!
We’re accepting applications now for our Appalachian Leadership Institute (ALI), which trains people who live or work in the region to:
🌳 Recognize and utilize unique assets in their communities
💡 Identify and implement strategies to improve infrastructure, workforce development, tourism and more
🤝 Collaborate with other leaders to plan for Appalachia’s growth
ALI — at no cost to participants — focuses on skill-building, mentoring and cooperation. Six multi-day seminars will take place across the region from October to June 2026.
Applications are open until June 15, 2025! Learn more and apply now.
Critical Condition: How Medicaid Cuts Would Reshape Rural Health Care Landscapes
Authors: Michelle Mills, Chief Executive Officer, Colorado Rural Health Center; Kevin J. Bennett, Professor, University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Columbia
A defining theme in early 2025 has been reducing federal government expenditures, with the health care sector not being spared from the discussions. The withdrawal or reduction of federal support for Medicaid will have potentially devastating impacts on access to essential healthcare services, particularly for vulnerable rural populations such as the elderly, low-income families, and those with chronic conditions. Thus, the National Rural Health Association (NRHA), along with multiple partners both at the federal and state levels have been advocating for maintaining the federal support for Medicaid.
In rural communities, more people receive and rely on Medicaid coverage than their urban counterparts, due to lower incomes, greater percentage of older adults, higher cost of private insurance, and fewer private coverage options. Nearly 40% of children living in rural communities are covered by Medicaid and CHIP, while almost 20% of non- elderly adults are covered.i Cuts to these populations covered under Medicaid and CHIP would be devastating for rural families. Costs of care for our most vulnerable rural residents would rise to unsustainable levels.
If Medicaid funding is reduced, then it will result in higher rates of uninsurance across the US, with a higher impact in our most vulnerable rural areas. These are parents, children, and working adults who would no longer be able to obtain needed health care due to it being unaffordable. These are our neighbors, many of whom have chronic diseases that have to be regularly managed. Without coverage, many would go without care and end up in the emergency room or inpatient facility, resulting in uncompensated care that they will not be able to pay.
Ultimately, reductions in Medicaid funding will force rural facilities to shut their doors and rural residents to lose access to necessary care. NRHA calls on Congress to act as a unified, bipartisan voice to protect Medicaid funding that is vital to the health and economic sustainability of rural communities across the nation.
Pennsylvania Broadband Funding Resources Available
The PBDA held two webinars providing an overview of the Digital Connectivity Technology (DCTP) Program. These webinars also included presentations from Round One successful applicants, who offered insight to their projects and answered questions from webinar attendees. You can now view the recording of one of those webinars and the presentation utilized during the webinar, on the PBDA’s program page.
As a reminder, the applications for the DCTP will close at 11:59 PM, on Friday May 30, 2025. Additional resources to include updated FAQs can be found on the program page.
Any questions regarding the program, please do not hesitate to contact the PBDA.
Resources Available for Caregivers of Children with Autism
The ASERT Collaborative (Autism Services, Education, Resources and Training) is a statewide partnership that provides streamlined access to information for Pennsylvanians living with and impacted by autism. In partnership with UPMC for You Dental Care Managers, ASERT developed a resource for parents and caregivers to help children with autism prepare for dental visits. The content covers learning to tolerate tooth brushing, establishing dental hygiene routines, and getting ready for dental visits. There are also social stories for getting teeth cleaned, getting x-rays, and getting a cavity filled. Printed resources are also available upon request.
Critical Gaps: U.S. Veterans and Comprehensive Dental Care
The Coalition for Oral Health Policy, an initiative of the Santa Fe Group, published “All Veterans Deserve Comprehensive Dental Care.” This article addresses the critical gap in dental care access for U.S. veterans, highlighting how limited eligibility for dental services contributes to health challenges and financial strain. The authors propose actionable policy solutions to expand access tackling issues such as workforce shortages and outdated eligibility criteria to ensure all veterans receive the comprehensive care they deserve.
PA Coalition for Oral Health Executive Director Receives National Distinguished Service Award
Helen Hawkey, Executive Director of the PA Coalition for Oral Health (PCOH), received the 2025 M. Dean Perkins Distinguished Service Award presented by the Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors (ASTDD) at the 2025 National Oral Health Conference.
Helen was presented the award by PCOH board member, Kelly Braun from the Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health. The Distinguished Service Award is for a member, associate member, non-member, or organization who has made a significant contribution to ASTDD programs, initiatives, or dental public health.
PCOH serves as the dynamic leading voice to improve oral health across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. PCOH promotes oral workforce development, advocates for community water fluoridation, and advances and advocates for oral health policy and infrastructure across all systems. By bringing together a diverse group of leaders from across the state from schools of public health, philanthropic organizations, businesses, dental organizations, health insurance firms, advocacy organizations, state agencies, and other champions, PCOH has built a powerful coalition of more than 1,000 individual and organizational stakeholders.
An excerpt from her nomination notes, “Helen Hawkey has consistently demonstrated an unwavering commitment to advancing dental public health, leaving an indelible mark on the state and national level. Through tireless leadership, effective advocacy, and fostering unity between stakeholders and decision-makers, Helen has played a pivotal role in promoting the necessity of dental public health and ensuring its sustainability. Notably, she has made significant contributions in the areas of assessing the status of oral health in Pennsylvania, championing policy development that promotes access to dental care, and ensuring there is a solid infrastructure to carry out future work.”
Click here to view the full list of all award recipients and nominations presented by ASTDD.
COVID Worsened Shortages of Doctors and Nurses. Five Years On, Rural Hospitals Still Struggle
Even by rural hospital standards, Keokuk County Hospital and Clinics in southeastern Iowa is small.
The 14-bed hospital, in Sigourney, doesn’t do surgeries or deliver babies. The small 24-hour emergency room is overseen by two full-time doctors.
CEO Matt Ives wants to hire a third doctor, but he said finding physicians for a rural area has been challenging since the covid-19 pandemic. He said several physicians at his hospital have retired since the start of the pandemic, and others have decided to stop practicing certain types of care, particularly emergency care.
Another rural hospital is down the road, about a 40-minute drive east. Washington County Hospital and Clinics has 22 beds and is experiencing similar staffing struggles. “Over the course of the last few years, we’ve had not only the pandemic, but we’ve had kind of an aging physician workforce that has been retiring,” said Todd Patterson, CEO.
The pandemic was difficult for health workers. Many endured long hours, and the stresses on the nation’s health care system prompted more workers than usual to quit or retire.
Report: 100 Rural Hospitals Have Closed Labor and Delivery in 5 Years
From Becker’s Hospital Review
Labor and delivery services have ended or are set to end at 100 rural hospitals since the end of 2020, highlighting a growing maternal health access crisis across the U.S.
The findings come from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform’s most recent report on rural maternity care. Since the beginning of 2025, Becker’s has also reported on 13 maternity service closures, with four alone closing in Maine.
The report also revealed that 42% of U.S. rural hospitals still provide labor and delivery services, with less than one-third offering the services in 10 states. Over 130 rural hospitals that still deliver babies lost money in the last two years and could be forced to close the services to maintain financial sustainability.
Travel time to access labor and delivery services in rural areas has also increased. In many urban areas, the services are often accessible in less than 20 minutes, but in rural areas, travel times can take as much as 30 to 50 minutes.
“Rural maternity care is in a state of crisis, and more women and babies in rural communities will die unnecessarily until the crisis is resolved,” the report said. “Federal and state government officials and private employers must take immediate action to ensure that all health insurance plans are paying adequately to support high-quality maternity care in every community.”
Below are 10 states from the report that have seen heightened levels of labor and delivery unit closures since 2020. Their drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services along with the number of rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025 are also listed, per the report.
CHQPR’s full report can be accessed here.
1. Alabama
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 36
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 45 minutes
2. Connecticut
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: One
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: One
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 31 minutes
3. Florida
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Two
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 20
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 50 minutes
4. Idaho
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 14
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 39 minutes
5. Illinois
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Four
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery in 2025: 58
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 32 minutes
6. Indiana
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: 11
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 29
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 30 minutes
7. Maine
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Six
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 13
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 41 minutes
8. Ohio
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Eight
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 38
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 30 minutes
9. Pennsylvania
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Four
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 31
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 39 minutes
10. Wyoming
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 11
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 60 minutes
PHC4 Releases New Reports, Displaying Utilization Insights, at a County-Level
The Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) published a new set of County-Level Utilization Reports today, displaying the overall total number of inpatient hospitalizations and ambulatory/outpatient cases for Pennsylvania residents.
The information reflects outpatient data from hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory procedure data from freestanding ambulatory surgery centers in Pennsylvania from Quarter 3 of 2024. Also reflected is inpatient data for the same time period from acute care, long-term acute care, rehabilitation, psychiatric, and specialty hospitals, presenting a spectrum of focused data, at a county-level.
Barry D. Buckingham, PHC4’s Executive Director, believes that these reports provide a wealth of insight for stakeholders. “Providing these quarterly County-Level Utilization Reports supports a consistent supply of fact-based data. These insights represent a vast range of facility data and are amongst the timeliest reports available to stakeholders.” The reports are updated every quarter and show the number of cases for each county, with breakouts by patient age, sex, and payer.
These quarterly reports portray the current climate of public health in Pennsylvania and provide focus and perspective. The County-Level Utilization Reports are valued resources for local communities, health care professionals, and policymakers. By fostering a data-driven approach to health care, PHC4 envisions a healthier, more resilient society where resources are allocated effectively, and lives are improved. PHC4 aims to continue to serve its mission of empowering Pennsylvanians through transparency.
PHC4 is an independent council formed under Pennsylvania statute (Act 89 of 1986, as amended by Act 15 of 2020) in order to address rapidly growing health care costs. PHC4 continues to produce comparative information about the most efficient and effective health care to individual consumers and group purchasers of health services. In addition, PHC4 produces information used to identify opportunities to contain costs and improve the quality of care delivered.
For more information, visit phc4.org or access the reports here.
States Ranked by Potential Coverage Losses under Medicaid Work Requirements
From Becker’s Hospital Review
California is projected to experience the largest potential losses in Medicaid coverage if federal work requirements are enacted, according to an analysis released by the Urban Institute on April 14.
Approximately five million adults across the country could lose Medicaid coverage next year under a possible federal mandate requiring adults aged 19 to 55 in Medicaid expansion states to work. At least 10,000 adults in nearly every expansion state could lose coverage, with the largest losses occurring in the most populous states.
These coverage reductions are likely to stem from a lack of awareness or confusion about the new policy, rather than from enrollees failing to work. The extent of the losses could also vary depending on the final policy and how each state implements the work requirements.
The study examined a proposal that would withhold federal funds for adult Medicaid enrollees in expansion states who do not report working at least 80 hours per month, or who do not meet exemption criteria such as being a student, caregiver, or having a disability. Similar legislation has been proposed in several states this year.
States ranked by potential coverage losses under Medicaid work requirements:
- California: 1 to 1.2 million
- New York: 743,000 to 846,000
- Illinois: 193,000 to 220,000
- Pennsylvania: 174,000 to 198,000
- North Carolina: 171,000 to 195,000
- Arizona: 166,000 to 189,000
- Ohio: 158,000 to 180,000
- Michigan: 145,000 to 165,000
- Washington: 121,000 to 138,000
- Kentucky: 120,000 to 136,000
- Louisiana: 116,000 to 132,000
- New Jersey: 115,000 to 131,000
- Indiana: 102,000 to 116,000
- Virginia: 98,000 to 111,000
- Maryland: 95,000 to 109,000
- Colorado: 95,000 to 108,000
- Massachusetts: 86,000 to 98,000
- Oregon: 83,000 to 95,000
- New Mexico: 75,000 to 86,000
- Connecticut: 74,000 to 85,000
- Missouri: 69,000 to 78,000
- Minnesota: 67,000 to 76,000
- Arkansas: 62,000 to 70,000
- Nevada: 59,000 to 67,000
- Oklahoma: 47,000 to 53,000
- West Virginia: 38,000 to 44,000
- Iowa: 34,000 to 39,000
- District of Columbia: 26,000 to 30,000
- Rhode Island: 25,000 to 29,000
- Hawaii: 24,000 to 27,000
- Montana: 23,000 to 27,000
- Utah: 20,000 to 23,000
- Idaho: 17,000 to 20,000
- Delaware: 17,000 to 20,000
- New Hampshire: 17,000 to 19,000
- Nebraska: 13,000 to 15,000
- Maine: 11,000 to 13,000
- Alaska: 10,000 to 11,000
- South Dakota: 8,000 to 9,000
- Vermont: 7,000 to 8,000
- North Dakota: 5,000 to 6,000