- EOP: Improving Rural Health and Telehealth Access
- HHS Awards Over $101 Million to Combat the Opioid Crisis
- Research Brief: Rural Areas Have Higher Individual Health Insurance Premiums and Fewer Plan Choices
- 'Like a Horror Movie': A Small Border Hospital Battles the Coronavirus
- Using Pharmacists to Provide Care in Rural Areas
- Trump Administration Proposes to Expand Telehealth Benefits Permanently for Medicare Beneficiaries Beyond the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency and Advances Access to Care in Rural Areas
- President Trump Signs Executive Order on Improving Rural Health and Telehealth Access
- Rural Counties Playing Catch-up with 2020 Census Response
- FCC Extends 2.5 GHz Rural Tribal Priority Window
- HHS Extends Application Deadline for Medicaid Providers and Plans to Reopen Portal to Certain Medicare Providers
- Rural and Community Hospitals – Disappearing Before Our Eyes
- Research Brief: Rural Nurse Practitioners Work with More Autonomy than Urban Nurse Practitioners
- Native Americans Feel Devastated by the Virus Yet Overlooked in the Data
- Helping America's "Forgotten Places" Amid a Pandemic
- Study Examines Telehealth, Rural Disparities in Pandemic
The Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4), the independent state agency that collects and analyzes comparative information on healthcare organizations, has released its latest report on hospitals. PHC4 Executive Director Joe Martin noted the report shows Pennsylvania general acute care hospitals’ uncompensated care again decreased, as it has in each of the past five years, to $750 million in fiscal year 2018 from $766 million the previous year. The decline can be tied to provisions in the Affordable Care Act that improve access to health insurance, particularly for those unable to get coverage at their place of employment. The independent state agency’s study also showed the statewide average operating margin for hospitals decreased to 4.76% from 5.15% during the same time period.
The Flex Monitoring Team has published a new brief comparing the characteristics of communities served by Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) predicted to be at high risk of financial distress to communities served by all other CAHs. Using data from 2017, the Financial Distress Index (FDI) model assigns CAHs to high, mid-high, mid-low, or low predicted risk levels for 2019 using Medicare cost reports and Neilsen-Claritas data summed to market areas.
CAHs predicted to be at high risk of financial distress were found to serve communities with significantly higher percentages of non-White individuals (Black individuals in particular), lower high school graduation rates, higher unemployment rates, and worse health status.
According to Opioids in Appalachia: The Role of Counties in Reversing a Regional Epidemic, a new report issued today by the National Association of Counties (NaCO) and the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC), the 2017 death rate for opioid overdoses in Appalachian counties was an astounding 72 percent higher than non-Appalachian counties.
Since December, ARC has hosted six regional Recovery to Work Listening Sessions, each focusing on the role employment has in successful long term recovery. During the week of May 6, 2019, ARC announced the seating of the Substance Abuse Advisory Council (SAAC), a 24-member volunteer advisory group of leaders from law enforcement, recovery services, health, economic development, private industry, education, state government and other sectors. The SAAC will develop recommendations for ARC to consider as part of a strategic plan to build and strengthen a recovery ecosystem in Appalachian communities by drawing on their own expertise, as well as community insight gathered during the listening sessions.
Today, the SAAC wrapped up their inaugural meeting in Knoxville, Tennessee. Among the Council’s first tasks was to identify key needs in building a recovery ecosystem. This includes focused services to support those in recovery as they re-enter the workforce, as well as guidance to employers for how to successfully help these workers to be productive and professional. Other topics of discussion included the need for holistic strategies to help those in recovery access housing, transportation, and broadband.
“By focusing on the recovery ecosystem, which supports those in long-term recovery as they move back to the workforce, the Substance Abuse Advisory Council will be addressing an important piece of the overarching effort to combat substance use disorder in our Region,” said ARC Federal Co –Chair Tim Thomas.
The Council will to continue developing recommendations, which will then be formally presented to ARC later in the fall. More information about the Council, as well as other ARC work on this issue, is available at www.arc.gov/substanceabuse
The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) has launched a new resource that makes it easy to find technical assistance centers associated with many of HRSAs programs. Browse by topic, by bureau or office, or use the search function by accessing https://www.hrsa.gov/library/index.html.
Beginning June 11 through June 28. CMS announced Notice of Intent to Apply (NOIA) and application cycle dates for a January 1, 2020 start date for the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP). Beginning June 11, 2019, CMS will start accepting NOIAs via the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Management System (ACO-MS). You must submit a NOIA if you intend to apply to the BASIC or ENHANCED track of the Shared Savings Program, apply for a Skilled Nursing Facility 3-Day Rule Waiver, and/or establish and operate a Beneficiary Incentive Program. MSSP fast facts from January 2018 highlight that 1,210 rural health clinics and 421 critical access hospitals were included on ACO participant lists.
During the week of May 6, 2019, the Health Resources and Services Administration’s (HRSA) Federal Office of Rural Health Policy awarded $24 million for the second round of Rural Communities Opioid Response Program (RCORP) planning grants. Recipients across 40 states will receive $200,000 for one year to formalize partnerships with local stakeholders, conduct needs assessments, and develop plans to implement and sustain substance use disorder (SUD), including opioid use disorder (OUD), prevention, treatment, and recovery interventions.
People with complex care needs who live in rural communities face many of the same challenges experienced by individuals in urban areas, such as lack of transportation and food insecurity. However, rural communities are not just scaled-down cities. Despite facing similar challenges to patients living in urban areas, individuals with complex needs in rural areas often face additional hurdles caused by lack of infrastructure and geographic distances, making many high-touch complex care interventions difficult — if not impossible — to implement.
This brief, made possible through the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, explores challenges associated with providing complex care in rural and frontier communities and outlines opportunities to ensure effective programs. Drawing from experts across the country, it summarizes strategies to improve complex care delivery in rural areas and provides examples of rural communities that are enhancing care delivery through workforce adaptations, technology innovations, tailored patient engagement tactics, and new payment models and funding streams.
The brief can be accessed at https://www.chcs.org/resource/opportunities-to-advance-complex-care-in-rural-and-frontier-areas/.
May 8, 2019
By Seema Verma, Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Putting our Rethinking Rural Health Strategy into Action
Approximately 60 million Americans or roughly 1 in 5 live in rural areas, with nearly every state having a rural county. The Trump Administration recognizes the significant obstacles faced by patients and providers in rural areas. Among the five leading causes of death, rates are higher for rural communities, and for several conditions the gap between urban and rural communities has widened. Rural communities tend to have higher rates of poverty, higher rates of uninsurance or underinsurance, greater transportation difficulties in getting to a hospital or doctor’s office, and lack access to high-speed internet, which limits access to information. Rural areas face workforce shortage issues, where the patient-to- primary care physician ratio in rural areas is only 39.8 physicians per 100,000 people, compared to 53.3 physicians per 100,000 in urban areas. Since 2010, over 100 rural hospitals have closed and nearly 40% of rural hospitals currently running are operating with negative margins. This limits the ability for providers to compete based on high value care, and leads to fewer choices for beneficiaries in rural areas.
Those of you following the work of CMS over the past couple of years know that the Trump Administration has placed an unprecedented priority on improving the health of Americans living in rural areas. We furthered this commitment by introducing the first ever Rural Health Strategy as part of our Rethinking Rural Health Initiative to focus on ways we can strengthen the rural healthcare system and avoid unintended consequences of CMS policy and program implementation. Our Rural Health Strategy focuses on applying a rural lens to the vision and work of CMS, improving access to care through provider engagement and support, advancing telehealth, empowering patients in rural areas about making decisions on their healthcare and leveraging partnerships to improve rural health. Our goal at CMS is to develop programs and policies that ensure rural Americans have access to high quality care, support rural providers and not disadvantage them, address the unique economics of providing healthcare in rural America, and reduce unnecessary burdens in a stretched system to advance our commitment to improving health outcomes for Americans living in rural areas.
In the last year, we have taken several steps to improve rural health by leveraging technology to increase access for beneficiaries living in rural areas. Specifically, we have made historic changes to expand access to telehealth and other virtual services across the Medicare program. Medicare now pays for virtual check-ins that allow a patient to check in with their clinician by phone or other telecommunication system, and remote evaluations of recorded videos or images that a patient submits to their clinician, to help them decide together whether the patient needs to make a trip to be seen in-person. We also cover stand-alone telephone consultations with clinicians at Rural Health Clinics and Federally Qualified Health Centers, expanding access to care for patients in rural areas. We also expanded access to the services that can be delivered via telehealth, such as wellness visits that require additional time for complex patients and care for patients experiencing a stroke or with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Last month, we announced that we are providing more flexibility to Medicare Advantage plans to offer innovative telehealth services as part of their basic benefit, expanding access to care for our beneficiaries. And we have expanded access to telehealth as part of our overhaul of the Medicare Shared Savings Program, in the Pathways to Success final rule. In our model for Medicare Advantage plans, known as the Value Based Insurance Design (VBID) model, we are testing how to account for telehealth services in determining whether a plan’s network or access to services is adequate.
As part of rethinking rural health, we’ve taken great care to apply a rural lens to all our programs and policies – for every policy we review, we consider the impact on rural providers. While there are many factors that contribute to rural hospital closures, we are doing our part to provide stability and predictability, and to ensure access to care for rural areas. I’m excited to highlight a groundbreaking proposal that would transform the way CMS pays certain rural hospitals and hospitals in other low wage areas. As we’ve said before, accurate and appropriate Medicare payment rates are essential to all hospitals, especially those serving rural areas. The wage index is an adjustment to hospital payments to account for differences in local labor costs. However, disparities exist between high wage index and low wage index hospitals. A hospital in rural Alabama could receive a Medicare payment of about $4000 for treating a beneficiary admitted for pneumonia while a hospital in a high wage area, like many urban communities, could receive a Medicare payment of nearly $6000 for the same case, all due to differences in their wage index.
Last year, we invited comments on how we could improve the Medicare wage index. Many responses reflected a common concern that the current wage index system perpetuates disparities in Medicare payment between high and low wage index hospitals across the country. Commenters stated that higher wage hospitals, by virtue of higher Medicare payments, can afford to pay higher wages that allow them to continue receive higher payments; whereas low wage index hospitals cannot afford to pay wages that would allow them to climb to a higher wage index and they continue to receive lower hospital payments. Commenters stated that over time, this has created a downward spiral that increases the disparity in payments between high wage index hospitals and low wage index hospitals. Further, under the law, the wage index adjustment must be made in a way that ensures that aggregate payments to hospitals are not affected by changes — that is, wage index adjustments must be “budget neutral” on a nation-wide basis. That means as payments for higher wage index hospitals increase, lower wage index hospitals get less.
The Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) proposed rule puts our Rural Health Strategy into action by proposing to change the way Medicare factors local labor costs into hospital payments. To address these Medicare payment disparities, CMS is proposing to increase the wage index of rural and other low wage index hospitals. This change would begin to bring payments to rural and other low wage index hospitals closer to urban neighbors, allowing them to improve quality, attract more talent, and improve patient access. We are considering several ways address these disparities. Each approach would have different levels of impact, and we are seeking input on the most appropriate way to address this issue.
In addition, CMS is proposing a change to the wage index “rural floor” calculation. Under the law, the IPPS wage index value for an urban hospital cannot be less than the wage index value for hospitals located in rural areas in the state. This is known as the “rural floor” provision. CMS is concerned that some hospitals may be using urban-to-rural reclassifications to inappropriately influence the rural floor wage index value. To address this concern, CMS proposes removing urban-to-rural hospital reclassifications from the calculation of the rural floor wage index value.
If finalized, these proposed policies would go into effect on October 1, 2019, benefiting certain rural and other low wage communities as early as this year. The proposed changes would create an opportunity to make sure that the current foundation of rural healthcare – hospitals – are in the best position possible to improve the quality and sustainability of care they are providing and that the approximately 60 million patients living in rural areas maintain access to critical services. I look forward to your input on these proposals, so we can ensure we are achieving our goals of better serving individuals in rural areas by empowering patients in rural communities and providing high quality accessible healthcare.
And this is just the beginning – our work on behalf of rural Americans is not done, as we are turning to how we can support local communities in their efforts to overhaul the current way of thinking for rural healthcare. We intend to test new approaches to policy in this area and leverage all of the agency’s authorities to improve the current system. We recently announced the CMS Primary Care First Initiative, a new set of payment models for primary care practices and other providers. One of the new payment models, the Direct Contracting model, includes an option for innovative organizations to take on financial risk in a defined region, which could be an option to support rural transformation of care. Driving accountability to a local level empowers communities to devise strategies to meet their unique health care needs. We are seeking public comment through a new Request for Information and welcome your insights on how to ensure the Geographic Option of Direct Contracting works for rural areas.
CMS is also developing another new innovative model specifically for rural communities that will come out later this year that will offer a pathway for stakeholder coalitions comprised of providers, purchasers, and payers to invest collectively in increasing access and improving rural healthcare delivery. The model will offer support and resources so that participating communities will be able to design a customized model that reflects the aligned priorities and needs of their own community. Ultimately, the goal is to improve the quality of care delivered in rural communities; enhance patient access to care; modernize the community’s delivery system, including expanding access to innovative technologies; and transition rural providers to value-based payment models that promote provider stability and financial sustainability.
Rethinking Rural Health is a vital part of CMS’s push to transform the healthcare delivery system to a model that delivers high quality, affordable, and accessible healthcare for every American. While we have undertaken a number of steps, we know there is much more work to be done– our beneficiaries residing in rural areas deserve nothing less.
SAMHSA Suicide Prevention Competencies for Faith Leaders. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) joined with the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention to produce this guide to help faith leaders prevent suicide.
The Great Plains Center for Agricultural Health is promoting Mental Health Awareness Month with a collection of resources and learning events to help farmers, workers, and their families find ways to get help if and when they need it.